IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v76y1994i1p26-35..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dual Approach to Evaluating Research Benefits in the Presence of Trade Distortions

Author

Listed:
  • Will J. Martin
  • Julian M. Alston

Abstract

We present a new approach for evaluating the welfare consequences of technical change. A major feature is its ability to incorporate multiple distortions and multiple sources of technical change in interrelated markets. A modified balance-of-trade function provides money measures of welfare change in terms of producer profits, consumer expenditures, and tax revenues. Alternative specifications of technical change are presented to capture the effects of differences in the form of technical change. In an illustrative numerical example, the approach is applied to a case involving two distortions and technical changes in two related markets. The example shows that the approach is reasonably easy to use and that accounting correctly for price distortions can have important implications for research benefit measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Will J. Martin & Julian M. Alston, 1994. "A Dual Approach to Evaluating Research Benefits in the Presence of Trade Distortions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(1), pages 26-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:76:y:1994:i:1:p:26-35.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1243917
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:76:y:1994:i:1:p:26-35.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.