IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/journl/v9y2013p173-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Roadmapping Vs. S-Curves: How To Switch To The Next S-Curve

Author

Listed:
  • Gerd Grau

    (Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America)

Abstract

There are two very important tools in managing technology: roadmapping and s-curves. Roadmapping can be a very effective tool to evolutionarily advance an existing technology. Conversely the idea of s-curves aids managers in the decision to make a revolutionary change to a new technology. The semiconductor industry is a prime example of a very successful roadmapping exercise. However, with continued scaling traditional microfabrication based on top-down lithography techniques becomes exceedingly expensive and complex. Many academic and industrial researchers work on alternative technologies to switch to the next s-curve. This work examines a first order approach to analyze such new technologies. The case of bottom-up nano-assembly is used as an illustration. Its merits are contrasted with current technology to come to a first assessment of its viability as the next s-curve. However, this is only a starting step to guide managers and technologists into the right direction when investigating new technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerd Grau, 2013. "Roadmapping Vs. S-Curves: How To Switch To The Next S-Curve," Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 9, pages 173-182.
  • Handle: RePEc:osi:journl:v:9:y:2013:p:173-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.hr/repec/osi/journl/PDF/InterdisciplinaryManagementResearchIX/IMR9a14
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    decision theory; managing technology;

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:journl:v:9:y:2013:p:173-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hrvoje Serdarusic, PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.