IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v2y2014i2p332-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Indicators For The Romanian Companies Between Eligibility And Bankability Of Eu Financed Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Droj Laurentiu

    (University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics,)

Abstract

The main goal of this research is to compare the eligibility indicators for accessing EU projects with the bankability indicators at the level of Romanian companies. This study was realized in a period when the term of bankability seems to be in the focus of the beneficiaries and management authorities for European funding, of the banking system and of the mass-media as well. This happens for the first time since the launch in 2007-2008 of the main structural EU funding programs focusing on the development of competitive SMEs, which brought significant changes in the EU funding environment. The same with the public institutions, many SMEs have applied for grants in order to finance their investments using different funding programs, especially under the European Regional Development Fund. This process to obtain European funding was a long one in term of evaluation and contracting periods. Under this context, the initial success of SMEs that have successfully applied and even managed to gain access to European funding was overshadowed by another sharper problem: lack of financial resources for co-financing to support investments or expenditures in the initial stages funding the project. This was also a big problem since the start of word financial and economic crisis. Under this context the banking sector was supposed to be heavily involved in ensuring external financing. The main difficulties in co-financing European funding projects by the banks came from the fact that the companies were requested to obtain satisfactory scores in order to qualify for the banking loans. Several indicators were used by the banking sector to analyze the creditworthiness of the applicant companies. From these indicators we selected five of them to be tested by using Student distribution modelling within the ModelRISK – VoseSoftware application over a group of 50 companies located in the North-Western region of Romania. After the model was created in this paper we tried to validate it. During the validation process of the model were observed differences between the relevancy of the proposed indicators in the analysis of the selected companies creditworthiness and also in the investment analysis itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Droj Laurentiu, 2014. "Financial Indicators For The Romanian Companies Between Eligibility And Bankability Of Eu Financed Projects," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 332-341, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:332-341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2014/n2/038.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bankability; Dispersion Modelling; Financing investment projects; Financial Indicators; Creditworthiness;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:332-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.