IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2021i1p397-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis Of Vocational Training Systems In The Light Of Eu Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Ágnes Stomp

    (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Health, Institute of Social and Sociological Sciences, Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Marianna Móré

    (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Health, Institute of Social and Sociological Sciences, Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

Continuous development of education and training programmes in the European Union is a key factor in enhancing cooperation at European level. Today, economic and social changes are taking place in the world, which is why vocational training is seen as a tool to prepare people for a changing world of work, improving employability and competitiveness. Vocational education and training must adapt to changes affecting the economy, society and the labour market. Vocational education and training (VET) policy has been a national, autonomous area of the Member States for decades, but the issue of VET has increasingly been given priority in the process of European economic unification. At the Lisbon Summit, the European Council recognised the important role of education as an integral part of economic and social policies, which is an important tool for increasing the European Union’s competitiveness. European cooperation in VET has been promoted by the three common European instruments created as a result of Copenhagen process: the European Qualifications Framework (EQF), the European Quality Assurance Reference Framework for Vocational Education and Training (EQAVET) and the European Credit System for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET), which are progressively integrated in their VET systems by the Member States. The aim of these instruments is to support recognition between European VET systems, to promote lifelong learning and mobility and to improve learning experiences. The aim of our study is to explore with a comparative study, to what extent and manner the V4 Member States (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia) have integrated EQF, EQAVET and ECVET transparency instruments into their national vocational training systems and to what extent the transformations are in line with EU objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Ágnes Stomp & Marianna Móré, 2021. "Comparative Analysis Of Vocational Training Systems In The Light Of Eu Guidelines," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 397-405, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:397-405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2021/n1/044.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorg Markowitsch & Günter Hefler, 2019. "Future developments in Vocational Education and Training in Europe," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-07, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      EU vocational education policy; national vocational education system; tools for transparency;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:397-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.