IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2015i1p993-996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional Judgement: A Must In The Audit Of Financial Statements

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Oana Chis

    (University 1 December 1918, Alba Iulia,)

  • Manoiu Sorana

    (University Babes Bolyai, Cluj Napoca, Faculty of Economic Since and Business Administration,)

Abstract

Professional judgement involves the application of auditor’s knowledge, skills and experience during all stages of the audit. Our article aims to study professional judgement in the audit of financial statements. It should be applied correctly and consistently in order to obtain a fair view of financial statements and to meet all financial users’ need for information. Being a mix of cognitive, technical, theoretical and cultural factors it was and is studied worldwide. The study highlights the fact that audit of financial statements needs professional judgement during all level at the audit. At the beginning the auditors must use it in order to select an audit client and judge the risks associated with it. During the planning stage the financial statements risks must be assessed and the proper level of procedures set for each financial statement line. Professional judgement must be used also during the testing phase when using techniques as sampling, when analysing complex transactions in which substance over form principle should be respected. Last, but not least a correct opinion should be given for the financial statements of each company. All in all, professional judgement becomes a must for auditors in the complex situations met.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Oana Chis & Manoiu Sorana, 2015. "Professional Judgement: A Must In The Audit Of Financial Statements," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 993-996, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:993-996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2015/n1/116.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    professional judgement; audit; financial statements;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics
    • M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:993-996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.