IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2012i1p1033-1038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proposal Of The Social Contract In Management As Instrument Of Analysis For The Employment Relation. The Experience Of Automotive Industry In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Muresanu Doina

    (Department of Management, Université du Québec in Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Canada)

Abstract

The communication presents the partial results of a research proposing the social contract as a new instrument of analysis for the employment relation in a social context in change, such as the case of Rumania. Until then, the research which aimed at the employment relation which is formed between the employer and the employees widely appealed to the concept of psychological contract (Rousseau, 1989; 1995). The psychological contract, defined as the perception of the mutual obligations assumed by the employee and by the employer, benefited from a fashion effect in the 1990s, when the economic difficulties questioned the model of classic employment relation based on loyalty. However, most of the empirical works on the psychological contract are static studies, for the greater part elaborated by questionnaire, which do not allow to define the impact of the social context change on the evolution of the employment relation. Although certain studies are interested in a context of change (Dick, 2010), most of the past works describe the contents and the evaluation of the psychological contract in an unchanging social environment. Yet, we saw it in the case of the ex-communist countries or those of the Northern Africa, the change in the environment of the employment relation is more present than ever.Our communication proposes a research frame which would be more suited to the understanding of the employment relation in a society in change. To do it, we rely on the social contract in management, which we define as the ensemble of the norms and of the tacit laws existing in a society or a group given with regard to the relation of employment. The approach by the social contract presents the advantage of including multiple elements bound to a societal context, such as the laws, the national culture, the faiths shared by the business environment, etc. (Rousseau, 1995). It offers a new frame of analysis for the employment relation by suggesting that it is through the systematic and global vision of the values and standards relating to the employment relation, that we can better comprehend the consequences of a change of the employment relation.Given its exploratory character, we use an inductive, thus qualitative, methodology, to perform this research. The partial results of the analysis of the interviews led in two Romanian companies during the summer of 2010 allowed us to identify several components, which we called \"terms\" of the social contract. These results will deliver to the practitioners and to the researchers in management a relevant tool to better understand the relation of employment in different national cultures as well as a measuring instrument for the quality of the employee-employer relation.Our communication ends by proposing various paths of reflection which will allow to use this approach in future researches concerning the employment relation.

Suggested Citation

  • Muresanu Doina, 2012. "Proposal Of The Social Contract In Management As Instrument Of Analysis For The Employment Relation. The Experience Of Automotive Industry In Romania," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1033-1038, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:1033-1038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2012/n1/152.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keeley, Michael, 1995. "Continuing the Social Contract Tradition," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 241-255, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magali Fia & Lorenzo Sacconi, 2019. "Justice and Corporate Governance: New Insights from Rawlsian Social Contract and Sen’s Capabilities Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 937-960, December.
    2. Domènec Melé, 2012. "The Firm as a “Community of Persons”: A Pillar of Humanistic Business Ethos," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 89-101, March.
    3. Richard Marens, 2007. "Returning to Rawls: Social Contracting, Social Justice, and Transcending the Limitations of Locke," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 63-76, September.
    4. Doina MURE?ANU, 2017. "Perceptions Of The Characteristics Of The Social Contract In Management In Romania Before 1989. Exploratory Case Study In The Romanian Automobile Industry," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 2(1), pages 31-36.
    5. Dirk Gilbert & Michael Behnam, 2009. "Advancing Integrative Social Contracts Theory: A Habermasian Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 215-234, October.
    6. Thomas Dunfee, 2006. "A Critical Perspective of Integrative Social Contracts Theory: Recurring Criticisms and Next Generation Research Topics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 303-328, October.
    7. Katherina Glac & Tae Kim, 2009. "The “I” in ISCT: Normative and Empirical Facets of Integration," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(4), pages 693-705, October.
    8. Lauren E. Aydinliyim, 2022. "The Case for Ethical Non-compete Agreements: Executives Versus Sandwich-Makers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 651-668, January.
    9. Paul Neiman, 2013. "A Social Contract for International Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 75-90, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social contract; psychological contract; change; employment relation; national culture;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:1033-1038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.