IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/cjoaac/v7y2022i1p11-19id602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allelopathic Potential of Sorghum Residues in Control of Two Weeds, the Great-Brome and Milk-Thistle

Author

Listed:
  • Oussama OUESLATI
  • Gley ELHOULA
  • Moncef BEN-HAMMOUDA

Abstract

Biological weed control through the use of the ‘natural herbicide’ potential of certain allelopathic crops could be an alternative to conventional herbicidal methods. This work was carried out to investigate the allelopathic potential of a ‘Super Graze II’ hybrid of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), used as a cover crop by growers who practice conservation agriculture in Tunisia, to control two endemic weeds, the great-brome (Bromus diandrus) and milk-thistle (Silybum marianum), that infest the fields where winter straw cereals are grown in the semi-arid zone of Tunisia, causing yield losses. A bioassay was used to evaluate the phytotoxicity of sorghum plant components and root exudates. Water extracts of the sorghum expressed an inhibitory effect on the germination and seedlings’ growth of the weeds. Radicle growth was more affected than coleoptiles growth. Stem-extract was the most phytotoxic on radicle growth of great-brome and milk-thistle with inhibition of 66% and 86%, respectively. Regardless of the weed species, the effect of root exudates of sorghum was significant (p=0.05). Radicle length was more affected than coleoptiles length which was reduced by 42% and 71%, for great-brome and milk-thistle, respectively. Sorghum was more efficient for milk-thistle control. The results showed a potential use of sorghum as a natural herbicide, either alone or in combination with classical control methods. This practice should consider the choice of a cereal species/variety in succession tolerant to the phytotoxicity expressed by the sorghum hybrid.

Suggested Citation

  • Oussama OUESLATI & Gley ELHOULA & Moncef BEN-HAMMOUDA, 2022. "Allelopathic Potential of Sorghum Residues in Control of Two Weeds, the Great-Brome and Milk-Thistle," Canadian Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Online Science Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 11-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:cjoaac:v:7:y:2022:i:1:p:11-19:id:602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/cjac/article/view/602/1379
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/cjac/article/view/602/1390
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:cjoaac:v:7:y:2022:i:1:p:11-19:id:602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/cjac/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.