IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/ajoeal/v4y2019i1p84-97id52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implemented Instructional Models in Tanzania: Experiences from Selected Higher Education Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Bryson D. Kinyaduka
  • Perpetua J. Kalimasi
  • Anja Heikkinen

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore norm (standard) instructional models for institutions and professors, implemented instructional models and factors which resulted in implemented instructional models . This study used a case study research design, specifically multiple case study design. This study used observation, semi-structured interviews and documentary review to collect data. This study involved nineteen professor participants. In this study, data analysis was aided by the ATLAS.ti. Software. The Competence-Based Model (CBM) and Moderated Traditional Model (MTM) were norm instructional models in the two studied higher education institutions. Moreover, the CBM was the norm instructional model for professors in the two institutions. The institutions were the Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy (MNMA) and the University of Dar es Salaam (UDSM). The implemented instructional models were Elusive Competence-Based Model (ECBM) or Mild Traditional Model (MiTM), the Elevated Traditional Model (ETM) and the Concentrated Competence-Based Model (CCBM). A number of factors contributed to implemented instruction models. Three main factors were indentified, namely poor economic conditions, poor instructional culture and inappropriate professor’s professional intuitions and qualities. Two norm instructional models were identified, but their implementation was inadequate; the inadequate implementation was attributable to aforementioned factors. The study recommends pilot implementation of educational innovations before their scaling.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryson D. Kinyaduka & Perpetua J. Kalimasi & Anja Heikkinen, 2019. "Implemented Instructional Models in Tanzania: Experiences from Selected Higher Education Institutions," American Journal of Education and Learning, Online Science Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 84-97.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:ajoeal:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:84-97:id:52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajel/article/view/52/52
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajel/article/view/52/901
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:ajoeal:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:84-97:id:52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajel/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.