IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/ajoeal/v4y2019i1p62-69id50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Responsibility for Learning in Higher Education in Tanzania: Experiences from Undergraduate Programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Bryson D. Kinyaduka
  • Perpetua J. Kalimasi
  • Anja Heikkinen

Abstract

In recent years, the requirement for students to shoulder responsibility for learning has been conceived as one of important attributes of a student or a graduate. This attribute is assumed to be developed through the application of competence-Base Model (CBM) in higher education as opposed to the application of the Traditional Model (lecture to seminar model) practiced in higher education for centuries. Given the importance of shouldering the responsibility for learning among students, particularly, in developing lifelong learning attitude among students, it was thus vital to study to understand whether or not the instructional models designated to operate or the implemented instructional models developed the important feature among undergraduate students. This study adopted a longitudinal study design. This study had a sample size of 183 respondents in phase I and a sample size of 70 respondents in phase II. Further, the study used questionnaire to collected data in two consecutive semesters to year one undergraduates. The Elusive Competence-Based Model (ECBM) and the Elevated Traditional Model (ETM) were instruction models in operation at the time of this study. The ECBM resulted in gradual deterioration of students’ responsibility for learning whereas the ETM resulted in gradual development of students’ responsibility for learning toward a positive direction. The study concludes that the use of seminars in an effective way contributes in promoting responsibility for learning among undergraduate students.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryson D. Kinyaduka & Perpetua J. Kalimasi & Anja Heikkinen, 2019. "Developing Responsibility for Learning in Higher Education in Tanzania: Experiences from Undergraduate Programmes," American Journal of Education and Learning, Online Science Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 62-69.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:ajoeal:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:62-69:id:50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajel/article/view/50/50
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajel/article/view/50/899
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:ajoeal:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:62-69:id:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajel/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.