The Consistency of Self-Declared Hedge Fund Styles — A Return-Based Analysis with Self-Organizing Maps
AbstractWhile hedge funds have common features, they remain an extremely diverse asset class. Despite this diversity, a consistent classification system is important for numerous purposes such as portfolio construction, performance attribution as well as risk management. This topic is also connected to the financial stability debate, which has recently dealt intensively with the issue of hedge funds. Diversified (fund) portfolios with an appropriate risk monitoring system in place will e.g. enhance risk-sharing among financial market participants. As fund self-declaration is prone to strategic misclassification, return-based taxonomies grouping funds along similarities in realized returns can be used to avoid this pitfall. In this paper we use Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) to find homogeneous groups of hedge funds based on similar (return) characteristics. Based on this technique, we can identify nine hedge fund classes. Whereas managed futures, sector financial and short-sell hedge funds are largely consistent in their self-declared strategies, we detect a number of declared hedge fund styles displaying no or very limited return similarities. Especially the so-called _equity hedge_ style encompasses too many different substyles with different return characteristics. Another important aspect that our paper addresses is the tendency of fund managers to perform undisclosed changes of their trading style or to strategically misdeclare their funds. Our results show that so called _style creep_ is an issue in the hedge fund business, with funds which misclassified themselves once being very likely to change their trading style again.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank) in its journal Financial Stability Report.
Volume (Year): (2005)
Issue (Month): 9 ()
Postal: Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Documentation Management and Communications Services, Otto-Wagner Platz 3, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Stefan W. Schmitz).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.