IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbfi/y2021iq4-21b1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green transition: what have CESEE EU member states achieved so far?

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Scientific evidence and political commitments require decisive measures to both mitigate and adapt to climate change. This stock-taking exercise sheds light on the green transition to climate neutrality in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe (CESEE), comparing the EU members in CESEE in the aggregate with the group of other EU countries. Over the last three decades, CESEE economies have converged substantially to EU averages with respect to both carbon intensity and income per capita – on the back of their profound and painful restructuring process mainly in the first decade of their transition to market economies. Analyzing the development of greenhouse gas emissions in CESEE from 1990 to 2018, we find that energy intensity dropped markedly, the share of transport sector emissions increased sharply and reliance on coal, while still substantial, declined. Industry electricity prices before taxes in CESEE are roughly on a par with the EU average, but household energy prices before taxes are still moderately lower in nominal – but clearly higher – in real terms (adjusted for income levels). At the same time, (implicit) CO2 prices are below EU average levels. Comparing EU member states’ climate policy commitments, we find that both the CESEE and the other EU members are very likely to have met the long-standing targets for 2020 on aggregate, with the targets for the CESEE region having been relatively modest. We conclude that despite their still lagging behind somewhat, CESEE economies are generally well positioned to advance their green transition at relatively low costs and to compete for market shares in green industries. However, all EU member states must step up their efforts in the coming years to have a reasonable chance of reaching their net-zero emission target in 2050 and the intermediate target to reduce net emissions by 55% up to 2030. Our assessment is relevant for the ongoing drive in the EU to mobilize finance for sustainable growth – a drive which involves central banks and supervisors in banks’ home and host countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Breitenfellner & Mathias Lahnsteiner & Thomas Reininger & Jakob Schriefl, 2021. "Green transition: what have CESEE EU member states achieved so far?," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q4/21, pages 61-76.
  • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfi:y:2021:i:q4/21:b:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:71caefef-0599-4245-b42b-d590d5d43b89/04_FEEI_q4-21_Green-transition.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angela Köppl & Stefan Schleicher & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2019. "Policy Brief: Fragen und Fakten zur Bepreisung von Treibhausgasemissionen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 62071, April.
    2. Peszko,Grzegorz & Van Der Mensbrugghe,Dominique & Golub,Alexander Alexandrovich, 2020. "Diversification and Cooperation Strategies in a Decarbonizing World," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9315, The World Bank.
    3. Grzegorz Peszko & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe & Alexander Golub & John Ward & Dimitri Zenghelis & Cor Marijs & Anne Schopp & John A. Rogers & Amelia Midgley, 2020. "Diversification and Cooperation in a Decarbonizing World," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 34011, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antoine GODIN & Guilherme MAGACHO & Achilleas MANTES & Devrim YILMAZ & Etienne ESPAGNE, 2021. "Developing Countries’ Macroeconomic Exposure to the Low-carbon Transition," Working Paper 987d9eb7-8fce-4eb0-8cb7-d, Agence française de développement.
    2. Igor Makarov, 2022. "Does resource abundance require special approaches to climate policies? The case of Russia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Zauresh Atakhanova, 2021. "Kazakhstan’s oil boom, diversification strategies, and the service sector," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(3), pages 399-409, October.
    4. Golub, A. & Potashnikov, V., 2022. "Theoretical analysis of development traps: On the example of Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 56-74.
    5. Alexander Golub & Jon Anda & Anil Markandya & Michael Brody & Aldin Celovic & Angele Kedaitiene, 2022. "Climate alpha and the global capital market," Working Papers 2022.19, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Berger, Johannes & Strohner, Ludwig & Thomas, Tobias, 2020. "Klimainstrumente im Vergleich: Herausforderungen in Hinblick auf ökologische, ökonomische und soziale Nachhaltigkeit," Policy Notes 39, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Stephan Schulmeister, 2020. "Fixing long-term price paths for fossil energy: the optimal incentive for limiting global warming," ICAE Working Papers 112, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    8. S. V. Chepel’, 2022. "Investment, Technological, and Social Aspects in Modeling the Transition to Low-Carbon Development: The Case of Uzbekistan," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 571-581, October.
    9. Dominik Bernhofer, 2021. "Die Verteilungseffekte einer CO2-Bepreisung im Haushaltssektor: Ein Überblick über die aktuelle empirische Literatur," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 47(2), pages 225-239.
    10. Lukas Folkens & Petra Schneider, 2022. "Responsible Carbon Resource Management through Input-Oriented Cap and Trade (IOCT)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    climate change; low-carbon transition; economic development; environmental sustainability; Central; Eastern and Southeastern Europe;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfi:y:2021:i:q4/21:b:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elisabeth Beckmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.