IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/edukaa/5kgglbdlm4zw.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality assured assessment processes: evaluating staff response to change

Author

Listed:
  • Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli
  • Craig Zimitat
  • Aduli E.O. Malau-Aduli

Abstract

Medical education is not exempt from the increasing societal expectations of accountability and this is evidenced by an increasing number of litigation cases by students who are dissatisfied with their assessment. The time and monetary costs of student appeals makes it imperative that medical schools adopt robust quality assured assessment processes. The success of these processes depends on the ability of faculty to determine the necessary changes required and manage the change process. Openness to change is critical; therefore, identifying the processes that facilitate staff openness constitutes an important step in better understanding how higher education institutions can ensure that staff members are willing to support and engage in change initiatives. This paper examines the contribution of the three attributes of the change model (content, process and context) in relation to staff openness to the quality assurance processes of assessment changes that were implemented at the University of Tasmania’s School of Medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli & Craig Zimitat & Aduli E.O. Malau-Aduli, 2011. "Quality assured assessment processes: evaluating staff response to change," Higher Education Management and Policy, OECD Publishing, vol. 23(1), pages 1-24.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:edukaa:5kgglbdlm4zw
    DOI: 10.1787/hemp-23-5kgglbdlm4zw
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-23-5kgglbdlm4zw
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/hemp-23-5kgglbdlm4zw?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:edukaa:5kgglbdlm4zw. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.