IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oap/ijetal/v2y2018i1p16-28id41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Impact: A Comparison of Learning Experiences and Outcomes of Students Completing A Traditional Versus Multidisciplinary, Project-Based Introductory Statistics Course

Author

Listed:
  • Dierker, Lisa
  • Flaming, Kristin
  • Cooper, Jennifer L.
  • Singer-Freeman, Karen
  • Germano, Kaori
  • Rose, Jennifer

Abstract

The teaching of statistics is limited by numerous challenges that are not easily overcome with traditional pedagogical approaches. To evaluate the potential impact of a multidisciplinary, project-based course in introductory statistics, this article examines differences in course experiences, confidence, and interest in future experiences with data analysis and applied statistics of students enrolling in a traditional introductory statistics course compared to a multidisciplinary, project-based course. Results demonstrated that students enrolled in the project-based course had more positive course experiences, showed a greater likelihood of increases in confidence in managing data (e.g. setting aside missing data, creating scales and/or dichotomizing variables), choosing the correct statistical test, and writing syntax or code to run statistical analyses. They also showed greater interest in pursuing additional course-work in statistics and related topics. Findings were not better accounted for by differences in background characteristics of the students enrolled in the traditional vs. project-based course.

Suggested Citation

  • Dierker, Lisa & Flaming, Kristin & Cooper, Jennifer L. & Singer-Freeman, Karen & Germano, Kaori & Rose, Jennifer, 2018. "Evaluating Impact: A Comparison of Learning Experiences and Outcomes of Students Completing A Traditional Versus Multidisciplinary, Project-Based Introductory Statistics Course," International Journal of Education, Training and Learning, Online Academic Press, vol. 2(1), pages 16-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:oap:ijetal:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:16-28:id:41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJETL/article/view/41/42
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJETL/article/view/41/573
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oap:ijetal:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:16-28:id:41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Heather Rothman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJETL/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.