IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nzb/nzbbul/may20185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decrypting the role of distributed ledger technology in payments processes

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The financial sector has grown ever more interested in crypto-currencies and the innovative Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) that underpins them. For central banks, in their role as providers of currency and critical payments infrastructure, a key area of interest is whether DLTs could be used to enhance existing payment processes. This article gives a high-level explanation of how different DLTs can change payments processes. The answer depends on what form the distributed ledger takes. We identify four binary elements that determine the different properties of distributed ledgers and use case studies to evaluate how these elements can improve on, or fall short of, existing payments infrastructure. We find that Blockchain – the most well-known DLT that underpins Bitcoin – brings benefits in terms of the speed of cross-border settlement and improves security by removing the single point of failure, but has drawbacks in terms of slowing the speed and increasing the cost of smaller domestic transactions, and being energy intensive. Some central banks have experimented with other forms of DLTs that try to capture some of the benefits of Blockchain while minimising the costs, but so far these DLTs have tended to mimic existing payment processes and have not demonstrated many additional benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber Wadsworth, 2018. "Decrypting the role of distributed ledger technology in payments processes," Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, vol. 81, pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nzb:nzbbul:may2018:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/-/media/ReserveBank/Files/Publications/Bulletins/2018/2018may81-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anton Badev & Maria Baird & Timothy Brezinski & Clinton Chen & Max Ellithorpe & Linda Fahy & Vanessa Kargenian & Kimberley Liao & Brendan Malone & Jeffrey C. Marquardt & David C. Mills & Wendy Ng & An, 2016. "Distributed Ledger Technology in Payments, Clearing, and Settlement," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2016-095, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morten Linnemann Bech & Jenny Hancock & Tara Rice & Amber Wadsworth, 2020. "On the future of securities settlement," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, March.
    2. Douglas Arner & Raphael Auer & Jon Frost, 2020. "Stablecoins: potential, risks and regulation," BIS Working Papers 905, Bank for International Settlements.
    3. Jamie Morgan, 2023. "Systemic stablecoin and the brave new world of digital money," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 47(1), pages 215-260.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benos, Evangelos & Garratt, Rodney & Gurrola-Perez, Pedro, 2017. "The economics of distributed ledger technology for securities settlement," Bank of England working papers 670, Bank of England.
    2. Dimitrios Koutmos, 2020. "Market risk and Bitcoin returns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 453-477, November.
    3. Gerald P. Dwyer, 2017. "Blockchain: a primer," Chapters, in: Benton E. Gup (ed.), The Most Important Concepts in Finance, chapter 2, pages 12-27, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2020. "Blockchain-Enabled Corporate Governance and Regulation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-41, June.
    5. Carlo Gola & Andrea Caponera, 2019. "Policy issues on crypto-assets," LIUC Papers in Economics 2019-7, Cattaneo University (LIUC).
    6. Besong, Susan Enyang & Okanda, Tellma Longy & Ndip, Simon Arrey, 2022. "An empirical analysis of the impact of banking regulations on sustainable financial inclusion in the CEMAC region," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(1).
    7. John Caramichael & Gordon Y. Liao, 2022. "Stablecoins: Growth Potential and Impact on Banking," International Finance Discussion Papers 1334, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    8. Butijn, Bert-Jan, 2022. "From legal contracts to smart contracts and back again: Towards an automated approach," Other publications TiSEM cb0ba26e-6644-481d-b11c-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Anil Savio Kavuri & Alistair Milne, 2019. "FinTech and the future of financial services: What are the research gaps?," CAMA Working Papers 2019-18, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    10. Raphael Auer, 2019. "Embedded supervision: how to build regulation into blockchain finance," BIS Working Papers 811, Bank for International Settlements.
    11. Fangyuan Zhao & Wai Kin (Victor) Chan, 2020. "When Is Blockchain Worth It? A Case Study of Carbon Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    12. I. Belarev A. & A. Obaeva S. & И. Беларев А. & А. Обаева С., 2017. "О Распределенном Реестре И Возможности Его Применения // Distributed Ledger And Its Potential Application," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 21(2), pages 94-99.
    13. Andrea Caponera & Carlo Gola, 2019. "Economic and regulatory aspects of crypto-assets," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 484, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    14. Franklin Allen & Xian Gu & Julapa Jagtiani, 2021. "A Survey of Fintech Research and Policy Discussion," Review of Corporate Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(3-4), pages 259-339, July.
    15. Simon Fernandez-Vazquez & Rafael Rosillo & David De La Fuente & Paolo Priore, 2019. "Blockchain in FinTech: A Mapping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    16. Meyer Aaron & Francisco Rivadeneyra & Samantha Sohal, 2017. "Fintech: Is This Time Different? A Framework for Assessing Risks and Opportunities for Central Banks," Discussion Papers 17-10, Bank of Canada.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nzb:nzbbul:may2018:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Reserve Bank of New Zealand Knowledge Centre (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rbngvnz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.