IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/natrud/y2015i2p179-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Capital as a Personal Domain in the Social Network Structure (The Bulgarian Case)

Author

Listed:
  • Temenuga Rakadjhiiska

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Mihaela Misheva

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Marieta Hristova

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

This paper attempts to focus on both, the theoretical and the practical aspects of the "social capital" phenomenon as a form of capital. "Capital" is perhaps a central concept in economics and economic sociology acting as an explanatory principle and thus the most value-charged one. Its interpretation has given rise to the development of conflicting political ideologies. The aim is to examine social capital precisely as a form of capital, i.e. as a socio-economic phenomenon whose function is to bring benefits (profits) to its holder (carrier). The exponential growth of literature devoted to the interpretation of this phenomenon makes it increasingly difficult to identify new aspects in this research field. However, we will offer an unconventional interpretation of its differentia specifica moving away from the established "myth", yet weaving, or "transmitting" it in our understanding of social capital as a "private good", a product of sociality. Insofar as the main function of myths in contemporary social space is considered to be to provide meaning to social activities and accordingly to certain political decisions, we will attempt to differentiate the mythical in the established approaches to social capita of "rulers-thinkers“ (A. Glucksmann) and to reveal the pre-given meaning through it. Wå will present a theoretical reflection and an applied anamnesis of the function of the phenomenon in modern national space. To this end, firstly, we will discuss the link "knowledge-power" (M. Foucault), and secondly, the subordination of social knowledge to structures of authority and the creation of myths in social sciences. We will also present to the extent possible the already existing myth and its restrictions in order to explicate our understanding of social capital as personal property enabling its holders to receive benefits. The verification of our understanding of social capital in the real and virtual "national" field will be demonstrated as a result of our theory quest.

Suggested Citation

  • Temenuga Rakadjhiiska & Mihaela Misheva & Marieta Hristova, 2015. "Social Capital as a Personal Domain in the Social Network Structure (The Bulgarian Case)," Nauchni trudove, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 179-233, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2015:i:2:p:179-233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://research.unwe.bg/uploads/ResearchPapers/Research%20Papers_vol2_2015_No5_T%20Rakadjiiska,%20M%20Misheva,%20M%20Hristova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social capital; human capital; capital; mith and mithlogema at the social sciences; social networks.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • E20 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2015:i:2:p:179-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.