IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/godish/y2020i1p239-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive Election Campaign in the Gap between Theory and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Katia Mihailova

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

The paper presents research on the correspondence of the theoretical definition and the practical understanding and application by Bulgarian candidates for political posts in the elections hold in 2014-2019 of the concept “positive election campaign†. The questions are: does the meaning that the candidates attach to the term “positive campaign†correspond to its scientifically determined theoretical definition and how do the concept and its application correlate? The hypothesis states that (1) the phrase “positive campaign†is a key statement in the rhetoric of candidates; (2) the more conquered a country turns out to be, the more often the candidates for power build their pre-election political statements on the concept; (3) most often the election candidates mean a campaign with no compromising materials or hate speech, held in a spirit of good tone and ethics, promising more effective governance and a better future when they use the concept “positive campaign†; (4) the theoretical definition of the concept needs to be further developed and conceptualized within the paradigm of positivism. The hypotheses are tested by a media monitoring which identified 130 media publications covering candidates’ statements with the phrase “positive campaign†and content analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Katia Mihailova, 2020. "Positive Election Campaign in the Gap between Theory and Practice," Godishnik na UNSS, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 239-264, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:godish:y:2020:i:1:p:239-264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://unwe-yearbook.org/en/journalissues/article/10291
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    election campaign; positive campaigning; elections; political communication; pre-election rhetoric; positivism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y80 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines - - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:godish:y:2020:i:1:p:239-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.