IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nup/jrmdke/v8y2020i2125-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Tacit Knowledge on the Performance of Selected Universities in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Joan Wakasa MURUMBA
  • Tom KWANYA
  • Jane Cherono MAINA

Abstract

Tacit knowledge (TK) is non-codified and personal (sticky) knowledge that is difficult to transfer. TK cannot be said to be significant if there is a lack of tangible contributions. Universities can only realize such returns when there is growth in terms of (financial base, products, processes, customer base, employees’ loyalty) financial and non-financial indicators. The main objective of the research was to evaluate the effect of TK on organizational performance in selected universities in Kenya. The study adopted a mixed research approach as informed by pragmatism research paradigm. Data was collected from a study population of 65 respondents from four study sites which were Kibabii University, University of Nairobi, KCA University, and the University of Eastern Africa, Baraton. Semi-structured questionnaires were administered to academic deans; directors of research, innovation, and ICT; and heads of library services as well as planning and administration. Qualitative data was analyzed through conversation analysis, content analysis, and R which is a computer-assisted data analysis software. Chi-square tests, as well as multinomial logistic regression, were used for the quantitative data analysis. The findings of this study indicate that universities value TK as a key asset for organizational performance. The study identified TK as an asset that has helped institutions to grow in terms of work processes, decision making, and the creation of new products and/or services.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan Wakasa MURUMBA & Tom KWANYA & Jane Cherono MAINA, 2020. "Effects of Tacit Knowledge on the Performance of Selected Universities in Kenya," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 8(2), pages 125-144, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:8:y:2020:i:2:125-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/download/356/301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/356
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:8:y:2020:i:2:125-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristian-Mihai VIDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmsnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.