IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntu/ntugeo/vol9-iss1-156-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of food quality and safety on consumer perception and attitude to food choices in Romania. Opportunities under Green Deal

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Bei

    (S.C. HORTIBEI PROTMED SRL, Oradea, Romania)

  • Cristian Domuța

    (S.C. GENTIS PREST SRL, Sîniob, Romania)

  • Eugen Jude

    (S.C. VITAL PLUS FARMA SRL, Oradea, Romania)

  • Marius Oșvat

    (S.C. OSVAT PROTMED SRL, Oradea, Romania)

  • Andreea-Emanuela Drăgoi

    (Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy)

  • Bianca Mitrică

    (Institute of Geography, Romanian Academy)

Abstract

Consumer attitude and perception on food quality in general have caused and continue to cause a great deal of controversy, sparking the interest of food researchers and not only in studying the impact of food quality and safety on consumer behaviour. Assessing the level of knowledge on quality nutrition among consumers is of great importance on the metabolic benefits with a primary impact in ensuring and improving health and quality of life. According to EU Green Deal objectives, especially those highlighted in the Farm to Fork action, food quality is a key driver for enhancing organic farming as an important long term goal of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Taking into consideration those realities our paper aims to assess the impact of food quality and safety on consumers’ choices in Romania, while underlying progress on the main food-related indicators in Romania. The research methodology is based on a quantitative analysis using the questionnaires on quality of life as a whole for achieving relevant answers for the aspects regarding the perception on food quality in stages. Our main conclusion is showing that in Romania the whole system of achieving food security and safety of food consumption with a certain level of quality must start with food production and distribution system. Thus, it is necessary that this system responds to all the specific demands of food security without omitting the current impact of climate change on agriculture and the adaptation of agriculture to procedures meant to reduce the future impact on the environment. Also the indicators related to food quality in Romania are showing that the higher share of employed population in agriculture per total employed workforce in the context of small farms and subsistence agriculture, means that the goods produced are being largely designed for the self-consumption household, hence EU food quality standards are not always applicable to such products.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Bei & Cristian Domuța & Eugen Jude & Marius Oșvat & Andreea-Emanuela Drăgoi & Bianca Mitrică, 2021. "The impact of food quality and safety on consumer perception and attitude to food choices in Romania. Opportunities under Green Deal," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 9(1), pages 156-165, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol9-iss1-156-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globeco.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_9_no_1/geo_2021_vol9_no1_art_018.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    food quality; consumer perception; food safety; consumer behaviour; Romania; CAP; Green Deal; Farm to Fork action;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics
    • Q00 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - General
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol9-iss1-156-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefan Ciucu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuntro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.