IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v60y2007i3p521-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Can We Learn About Uncertain Tax Benefits From FIN 48?

Author

Listed:
  • Blouin, Jennifer
  • Gleason, Cristi
  • Mills, Lillian
  • Sikes, Stephanie

Abstract

FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, standardizes accounting for uncertain tax benefits and requires companies to disclose their tax reserve amounts. We summarize hand–collected disclosures related to tax reserves from 2005 through the first quarter of 2007. For the largest 100 non–financial, non–regulated firms, the reserve at adoption on January 1, 2007 is $78 billion excluding interest, or about two percent of assets. Of this $78 billion, an estimated $58 billion would affect earnings if ever released.

Suggested Citation

  • Blouin, Jennifer & Gleason, Cristi & Mills, Lillian & Sikes, Stephanie, 2007. "What Can We Learn About Uncertain Tax Benefits From FIN 48?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 60(3), pages 521-535, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:60:y:2007:i:3:p:521-35
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2007.3.11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2007.3.11
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2007.3.11
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2007.3.11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2007. "Press Release by The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, from The Essential John Nash," Introductory Chapters, in: Harold W. Kuhn & Sylvia Nasar (ed.),The Essential John Nash, Princeton University Press.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Borkowski, Susan C. & Gaffney, Mary Anne, 2021. "FIN 48 and the tax aggressive behaviors of transnational corporations: A decade later," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    2. Feldman, Naomi & Kawano, Laura & Patel, Elena & Rao, Nirupama & Stevens, Michael & Edgerton, Jesse, 2021. "Investment differences between public and private firms: Evidence from U.S. tax returns," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Cristian Carini & Michele Moretto & Paolo M. Panteghini & Sergio Vergalli, 2020. "Deferred taxation under default risk," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 33-48, January.
    4. Thomas Smith & Adrian Valencia & Ara Volkan & Jordin Vorisek, 2023. "Fasb Fin 48 Disclosures: Evidence On User Perceptions," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 15(1), pages 27-41.
    5. Lin, Shannon & Tong, Naqiong & Tucker, Alan L., 2014. "Corporate tax aggression and debt," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 227-241.
    6. Graham, John R. & Raedy, Jana S. & Shackelford, Douglas A., 2012. "Research in accounting for income taxes," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 412-434.
    7. Evers, Maria Theresia & Meier, Ina & Spengel, Christoph, 2014. "Transparency in financial reporting: Is country-by-country reporting suitable to combat international profit shifting?," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-015, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Evers, Andrea & Hundsdoerfer, Jochen, 2014. "Country-by-Country Reporting: Eine neue Rechnungslegung über länderspezifische Wertschöpfung und Ertragsteuern?," Discussion Papers 2014/20, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    9. Lisa De Simone & Jordan Nickerson & Jeri Seidman & Bridget Stomberg, 2020. "How Reliably Do Empirical Tests Identify Tax Avoidance?†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1536-1561, September.
    10. Michael P. Donohoe & Gary A. McGill & Edmund Outslay, 2014. "Risky Business: The Prosopography of Corporate Tax Planning," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 67(4), pages 851-874, December.
    11. Yost, Benjamin P., 2023. "Do tax-based proprietary costs discourage public listing?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:60:y:2007:i:3:p:521-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.