IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlrbe/105.00000169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rationality and Emotionality Interplay and Economic Contributions: A Neuroeconomics Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Ashutosh Sarker
  • Wai Ching Poon
  • Shamsul Haque
  • Gamini Herath

Abstract

In non-neuroscience-based studies, economists demonstrate that humans make suboptimal economic contributions (between zero and the theoretical maximum) in collective-action scenarios. Using a neuroeconomics experiment that integrates economics and neuroscience, this study investigates why humans make such suboptimal economic contributions. In this study, 90 adult participants, divided into 15 smaller groups, collectively participated in a computer-based public goods game while wearing electroencephalography headsets that recorded their neural activities during the game. The results show that when participants modified institutional arrangements (such as face-to-face communication), their economic contributions increased, albeit suboptimally. Furthermore, simultaneously and suboptimally in the frontal and temporal lobes, the participants’ positive rationality and emotionality increased, whereas their negative rationality and emotionality decreased. We suggest that suboptimal rationality and emotionality may underlie suboptimal economic contributions. This study offers broad implications for collectively and sustainably managing local, regional, and global commons, including the atmosphere in which humans cause climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashutosh Sarker & Wai Ching Poon & Shamsul Haque & Gamini Herath, 2023. "Rationality and Emotionality Interplay and Economic Contributions: A Neuroeconomics Experiment," Review of Behavioral Economics, now publishers, vol. 10(1), pages 27-44, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlrbe:105.00000169
    DOI: 10.1561/105.00000169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000169
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/105.00000169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlrbe:105.00000169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.