IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlrbe/105.00000034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistent Bayesians Are No More Accurate Than Non-Bayesians: Economists Surveyed About PSA

Author

Listed:
  • Berg, Nathan
  • Biele, Guido
  • Gigerenzer, Gerd

Abstract

This paper looks for, but cannot find, evidence that links belief inconsistency to belief inaccuracy or economic loss. Economists with consistent (i.e., Bayesian) conditional beliefs about the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) test have unconditional beliefs about the risk of prostate cancer that are, if anything, less accurate than the beliefs of inconsistent non-Bayesians. PSA decisions depend more on the advice of doctors and family members than on beliefs about cancer risks. Men’s beliefs about the pros and cons of PSA testing do not explain self-reported PSA decisions. This absence of evidence that non-Bayesian beliefs lead to economic loss suggests that belief consistency may be relatively unimportant as a normative criterion in high-stakes decision tasks that reward accuracy instead of consistency. A technique is introduced for eliciting measures of both consistency and accuracy of an individual’s probabilistic beliefs.

Suggested Citation

  • Berg, Nathan & Biele, Guido & Gigerenzer, Gerd, 2016. "Consistent Bayesians Are No More Accurate Than Non-Bayesians: Economists Surveyed About PSA," Review of Behavioral Economics, now publishers, vol. 3(2), pages 189-219, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlrbe:105.00000034
    DOI: 10.1561/105.00000034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000034
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/105.00000034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Logical consistency; Predictive accuracy; Elicitation; Non-Bayesian; Ecological rationality; Medical decision making;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics
    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlrbe:105.00000034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.