IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlpip/113.00000059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Equality Persist? Evidence from the Homestead Act

Author

Listed:
  • Bryan Leonard
  • Brian Kogelmann

Abstract

Passed in 1862, the Homestead Act was an important piece of legislation that gave away 160 acres of land in the Western United States to any individual willing to settle, cultivate, and occupy the land for a period of 5 years. Social scientists have examined the various impacts of the act extensively, but not in terms of its original aims. Many of those who fought for passage of the act rested their case on the moral claim that all persons have an equal right to the soil. This paper examines the extent to which the Homestead Act actually lived up to this moral ideal. We ask: did the Homestead Act lead to greater equality in the ownership of land? We find that the act did achieve greater equality in the short run but, in the long run, this equality proved fleeting, disappearing within 100 years of the act’s passage.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryan Leonard & Brian Kogelmann, 2022. "Does Equality Persist? Evidence from the Homestead Act," Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, now publishers, vol. 3(2), pages 215-241, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000059
    DOI: 10.1561/113.00000059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/113.00000059
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/113.00000059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.