IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnljfe/112.00000547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do Forest Owners’ Risk Preferences Affect Harvesting Decisions? A Case-study in Fujian Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Duan
  • Nicholas J. Hogarth
  • Yicheng Jiang
  • Qian Chen

Abstract

Collective forests in China are the major source of the nation's wood supply, and therefore understanding the harvesting decisions of the small-scale forest owners who manage them is crucial to realizing national forest production goals. However, forest owners' timber harvesting decisions depend very much on individual attitudes toward risks and benefits (i.e., risk preferences), but this topic has received very little research attention. In this paper, we applied prospect theory and lottery experiments to measure individuals' risk preferences. In 2018, 320 household questionnaires were combined with a field experiment in Fujian Province, China, to empirically determine the link between risk preferences and timber harvesting behavior. The results indicate that the higher the degree of risk aversion the forest owners have, the more they are willing to harvest forests under household management, as well as the earlier they are inclined to harvest. However, the harvesting amount per mu of risk-averse forest owners are lower than risk-neutral or risk-taking households due to lower investment in their forestlands. Further analysis indicates that improving forest owners' forestland tenure security is helpful to reduce forest owners' risk-avoiding behaviors. This study contributes to a better understanding of the relationship between household risk preference and timber harvesting behavior, and will help inform the design of alternative policies that could reduce forest management risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Duan & Nicholas J. Hogarth & Yicheng Jiang & Qian Chen, 2022. "How do Forest Owners’ Risk Preferences Affect Harvesting Decisions? A Case-study in Fujian Province, China," Journal of Forest Economics, now publishers, vol. 37(3), pages 259-293, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnljfe:112.00000547
    DOI: 10.1561/112.00000547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000547
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/112.00000547?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnljfe:112.00000547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.