IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnljfe/112.00000526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Nature Reserves on Human Well-being – Evidence from Giant Panda Reserves in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yaxin
  • Shen, Jinyu
  • Hogarth, Nicholas J.
  • Hou, Yilei
  • Duan, Wei

Abstract

The potential impact of nature reserves (NRs) on human well-being has been widely debated, while the results are still uncertain due to methodological challenges, data limitations, and underdeveloped theoretical framework. This study uses a seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) model to assess giant panda reserves’ impacts on human well-being. Using cross-sectional data of 714 households from both inside and outside of 14 giant panda reserves in Shaanxi and Sichuan provinces, we examined the impact of NRs on five dimensions of human well-being. Findings suggest that overall human well-being and the sub-dimensions of basic material for good life, good social relations, and the freedom of choice wellbeing are significantly higher for households living outside panda reserves than those living inside. In contrast, security was higher for households inside the reserves compared to outside. The results also indicate that households living inside the national-level NRs are significantly more satisfied with their basic material for good life and security than those living outside of national-level NRs. Furthermore, the negative impacts of the NRs on human well-being are relieved as the time since establishment increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yaxin & Shen, Jinyu & Hogarth, Nicholas J. & Hou, Yilei & Duan, Wei, 2021. "Impact of Nature Reserves on Human Well-being – Evidence from Giant Panda Reserves in China," Journal of Forest Economics, now publishers, vol. 36(1-2), pages 79-101, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnljfe:112.00000526
    DOI: 10.1561/112.00000526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000526
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/112.00000526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnljfe:112.00000526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.