IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jlastp/110.00000022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward More Effective Science and Technology Advice for Congress: The Historical Roots and Pathways Forward

Author

Listed:
  • Blair, Peter D.

Abstract

Science and technology (S&T) assessment designed to effectively inform Congress must be both credible and suitable to congressional needs. To be unimpeachably credible, it should be widely accepted as (1) authoritative, (2) objective, and (3) independent. To be suitable and well-matched to congressional needs, the advice must be (4) relevant, (5) useful, and (6) timely. For S&T advice today, Congress draws on many sources for advice but it created four organizations over the last century and a half to provide itself with different types S&T advice: (1) the National Research Council, the operating arm of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, (2) the Congressional Research Service, (3) the former Office of Technology Assessment, and (4) the Government Accountability Office. This monograph traces the historical roots of S&T advice for Congress and chronicles the creation and evolution of these four organizations over the past half century. Key characteristics for providing effective S&T advice for Congress are defined and then used to evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of these organizations today and to identify prospective organizational improvements in each to meet today’s needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Blair, Peter D., 2021. "Toward More Effective Science and Technology Advice for Congress: The Historical Roots and Pathways Forward," Annals of Science and Technology Policy, now publishers, vol. 5(2), pages 91-246, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jlastp:110.00000022
    DOI: 10.1561/110.00000022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/110.00000022
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/110.00000022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jlastp:110.00000022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.