IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/fnttom/0200000054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Research in the Production and Operations Management Field

Author

Listed:
  • Metters, Richard
  • Marshall, Donna
  • Pagell, Mark

Abstract

We summarize and categorize Operations Management (OM) research on two inter-related types of “culture†: exogenous, or national culture and endogenous, or organizational culture. OM cultural research is far less than one percent of total OM research. We posit that of that small amount, much of OM cultural research is based on numerical approaches that have questionable validity. Qualitative work is highlighted. In addition to being a guide for research, this article is meant to provide substantive examples for teaching the importance of culture in OM.

Suggested Citation

  • Metters, Richard & Marshall, Donna & Pagell, Mark, 2019. "Cultural Research in the Production and Operations Management Field," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 13(1-2), pages 1-150, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:fnttom:0200000054
    DOI: 10.1561/0200000054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0200000054
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/0200000054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manjul Gupta & Amulya Gupta & Karlene Cousins, 2022. "Toward the understanding of the constituents of organizational culture: The embedded topic modeling analysis of publicly available employee‐generated reviews of two major U.S.‐based retailers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3668-3686, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:fnttom:0200000054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.