IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nov/artigo/v27y2017i3p551-576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Análise do impacto da alteração normativa na aposentadoria por invalidez no Brasil [An analysis of the impact of the normative change in disability retirement in Brazil]

Author

Listed:
  • Helvio Antonio Pereira Marinho

    (PREVIC)

  • Moises de Andrade Resende Filho

    (UnB)

  • Vander Mendes Lucas

    (UnB)

Abstract

We investigate the response of federal civil servants to more stringent rules for disability retirement introduced by the Constitutional Amendment 41/2003 (EC 41/2003). First, we look for changes in the health conditions of Brazilians so to speculate on their effects on the use of disability benefit in Brazil. Then, we use those results in setting the control variables of econometric models we use to compare the behavior of civil servants (treatment group) and private sector workers (control group) in terms of the number and incidence of retirement disability. Based on difference in differences (DID) estimates, we conclude that civil servants responded to the incentive created with the new rules by preventing disability retirements and, thus, mitigating the moral hazard problem of social security.

Suggested Citation

  • Helvio Antonio Pereira Marinho & Moises de Andrade Resende Filho & Vander Mendes Lucas, 2017. "Análise do impacto da alteração normativa na aposentadoria por invalidez no Brasil [An analysis of the impact of the normative change in disability retirement in Brazil]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 27(3), pages 551-576, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:27:y:2017:i:3:p:551-576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/neco/v27n3/0103-6351-neco-27-03-551.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-63512017000300551&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social security; disability retirement; difference-in-differences; incentives; moral hazard;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:27:y:2017:i:3:p:551-576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucas Resende de Carvalho (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fufmgbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.