IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2014i3p30-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Aspects of University Activities in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei Belov
  • Alexander Zolotov

Abstract

Andrei Belov - Doctor of Science, Professor, Fukui Prefectural University, Japan. Address: Japan, 910-1195, Fukui, Eiheiji-Town, Matsuoka, Kenjojima 4-1-1. E-mail: abelov@fpu.ac.jpAlexander Zolotov - Doctor of Science, Professor, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod. Address: 23, Gagarin str., Nizhni Novgorod, 603950, Russian Federation. E-mail: avzolotov2@gmail.comReduction of available financial resources, increased social differentiation of society, and drop in students in 1990-2000s gave an impulse to structural reorganization of Japanese universities. Reforms affected coverage of higher education, as well as cost and quality of university education. As state financing was being reduced, the problem of preserving the achieved opportunities of university education was solved through restructuring higher education and expanding its private sector. The state concentrated resources in a small number of selected universities, denying both strict regulation and broad support to the bulk of private educational institutions. The consumer was made responsible for comparing themselves the cost and quality of provided education and for selecting a suitable university, while the state restricted its function to disclosing information about university activities and to eliminating asymmetry of such information. Concentration of resources in a small number of educational institutions, along with overall resource reduction, resulted rather in increased differentiation between the groups of universities than in a higher average level of education in the country. A situation close to a market failure was created, and the state had to intervene in order to build vertical relations and inter-university cooperation. The search for the best possible combination of cost, quality, and social characteristics of university education in Japan is by far not over. However, the experience accumulated and the lessons of implemented reforms may be of interest for many countries including Russia. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2014-3-30-53

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei Belov & Alexander Zolotov, 2014. "Economic Aspects of University Activities in Japan," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 30-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2014:i:3:p:30-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2015/06/16/1084121482/2014-3_Belov-Zolotov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Domingo Docampo, 2013. "Reproducibility of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities results," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(2), pages 567-587, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Domingo Docampo & Lawrence Cram, 2019. "Highly cited researchers: a moving target," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 1011-1025, March.
    2. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    3. D. Docampo & D. Egret & L. Cram, 2015. "The effect of university mergers on the Shanghai ranking," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 175-191, July.
    4. Hidalgo-Hidalgo Marisa & Valera Guadalupe, 2016. "University Merging Process: A Guideline Proposal for Excellence-Enhancing," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 1359-1386, September.
    5. Yang Zhang & Yu Xiao & Jun Wu & Xin Lu, 2021. "Comprehensive world university ranking based on ranking aggregation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1139-1152, June.
    6. Massucci, Francesco Alessandro & Docampo, Domingo, 2019. "Measuring the academic reputation through citation networks via PageRank," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 185-201.
    7. Enis Siniksaran & M. Hakan Satman, 2020. "WURS: a simulation software for university rankings—software review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 701-717, January.
    8. Živan Živković & Marija Panić, 2020. "Development of science and education in the Western Balkan countries: competitiveness with the EU," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2319-2339, September.
    9. Osmo Kivinen & Juha Hedman & Kalle Artukka, 2017. "Scientific publishing and global university rankings. How well are top publishing universities recognized?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 679-695, July.
    10. Vicente Safón & Domingo Docampo, 2020. "Analyzing the impact of reputational bias on global university rankings based on objective research performance data: the case of the Shanghai Ranking (ARWU)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2199-2227, December.
    11. Berlemann, Michael & Haucap, Justus, 2015. "Which factors drive the decision to opt out of individual research rankings? An empirical study of academic resistance to change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 1108-1115.
    12. Christine Barats, 2020. "Dissemination of international rankings: characteristics of the media coverage of the Shanghai Ranking in the French press," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Domingo Docampo & Lawrence Cram, 2015. "On the effects of institutional size in university classifications: the case of the Shanghai ranking," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1325-1346, February.
    14. Domingo Docampo & Lawrence Cram, 2014. "On the internal dynamics of the Shanghai ranking," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1347-1366, February.
    15. Antonio Fernández-Cano & Elvira Curiel-Marin & Manuel Torralbo-Rodríguez & Mónica Vallejo-Ruiz, 2018. "Questioning the Shanghai Ranking methodology as a tool for the evaluation of universities: an integrative review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 2069-2083, September.
    16. Nabil Amara & Réjean Landry & Norrin Halilem, 2015. "What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 489-530, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2014:i:3:p:30-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.