IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprec/y2009id931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Social Responsibility vs. Government Regulation: An Analysis of Institutional Choice

Author

Listed:
  • L. Polishchuk

Abstract

The paper presents an economic theory of corporate social responsibility (CSR) based on the Coase theorem and analyzes economic, social, political and institutional factors that could affect comparative advantages of CSR over government regulation. Discussion of the Russian CSR model stresses the importance of protection of property rights and social capital for efficient implementation of the CSR idea and cautions against excessive involvement of government in CSR processes.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Polishchuk, 2009. "Corporate Social Responsibility vs. Government Regulation: An Analysis of Institutional Choice," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2009:id:931
    DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2009-10-4-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/viewFile/931/932
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-10-4-22?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leidy Katerine Rojas Molina & José Ángel Pérez López & María Soledad Campos Lucena, 2023. "Meta-analysis: associated factors for the adoption and disclosure of CSR practices in the banking sector," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1017-1044, September.
    2. Garanina, Tatiana & Kim, Oksana, 2023. "The relationship between CSR disclosure and accounting conservatism: The role of state ownership," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2009:id:931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.