IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2021i1p30-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Regulatory Guillotine": Project Analysis Of New Regulatory Structures

Author

Abstract

One of the most important areas of the "regulatory guillotine" reform is the development of new regulatory structures for each sphere of public relations or type of state control (supervision). The research is based on a hypothesis about the possible desire of the authorities to preserve the current regulatory systems. The main purpose of the study is to assess the general level of the proposed regulatory structures from the point of view of their compliance with the Methodology for the implementation of the action plan ("Roadmap") for employing the mechanism of "regulatory guillotine", as well as to show the possible results and risks of their adoption in its current form in the potential improvement of control (supervision), focus on the most dangerous objects (entities) control, including in terms of whether mandatory requirements are related to potential risks of harm (damage) to protected values and sources of risk. The source of empirical data for the analysis was comprised of the drafts of new regulatory structures prepared by regulatory authorities and Supervisory authorities involved in the reform. The study examined 73 regulatory structures prepared by 26 Federal regulatory agencies and regulatory agencies.The study made it possible to draw a conclusion about the systemic shortcomings of the new regulatory structures and suggests substantive and organizational measures to improve the quality of the developed structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Egor Artemenko, 2021. ""Regulatory Guillotine": Project Analysis Of New Regulatory Structures," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 30-55.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2021:i:1:p:30-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2021:i:1:p:30-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.