IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/vgmu00/2017i2p27-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social services quality: Independent evaluation by recipients

Author

Listed:

Abstract

One of the key goals of modern governments social policy is to increase the quality of social services provision and, accordingly, the satisfaction level of citizens as social services consumers. The choice of methods and tools in order to solve this challenge is restricted to existing resources of government agencies: budget, personnel, information technologies, etc.Our research demonstrates that independent evaluation mechanism for social sphere organizations (SSO) work quality remains of a high demand in the worldwide context. In this paper the authors provide the methodology and results of the independent quality evaluation mechanism for social sphere organizations in Russia. We used secondary analysis of the sociological data arrays and Russian Statistics Service microdataas well as citizens opinions expressed in the Internet, in order to develop our methodology about citizens preferences for making choice among SSO. We used a comparative study to outline international experience in SSO independent evaluation process. We outlined key citizens satisfaction factors with social services provision by applying Kano model. We prove the multysubjective and multifactor nature of SSO independent quality evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Dmitrieva & Evgenyi Styrin & Elizaveta Yastrebova, 2017. "Social services quality: Independent evaluation by recipients," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 27-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2017:i:2:p:27-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2017/07/10/1170866254/%D0%94%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0,%20%D0%A1%D1%82%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD,%20%D0%AF%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%202-2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:vgmu00:2017:i:2:p:27-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina A. Zvereva (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.