IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/ddldem/19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formation of a polyfunctional structure of the system of transition mechanisms of Ukraine to sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Filippov Volodymyr

    (Odessa National Polytechnic University)

Abstract

The object of research is the multifunctional structure of the system of mechanisms of transition of Ukraine to sustainable development. The use of the concept of sustainable development of the society, which is focused on the optimal satisfaction of people's needs, provides sufficient quality of life, rational use of natural resources and environmental protection, and focuses on the creation of certain prerequisites, the essence of which is revealed in these articles. One of the priority components that have not been fully formed to shape the conditions for sustainable development of the country are: – economic (involves the effective use of all types of resources focused on reducing or eliminating pressure on natural ecosystems); – environmental (as a way of restoring the original state of the natural environment, preserving it on this levels, implementation of measures to the maximum possible improvement); – social (involves improving the well-being and quality of life of a person, preserving its health). System-integrated approach is used to managing sustainable development mechanisms that provide the socio-economic vector of becoming regions of the country. In the course of the research it is determined that the structure of sustainable development mechanisms is formed by state and non-governmental organizational structures that are formed at different levels of the mechanism and implement their decisions through levers of influence that fall within their powers, namely through: – regulatory; – tax policy; – budgetary-financial policy; – promotional support and more. Thanks to these levers, they can be effective and help to achieve the main goal of the organizational and management mechanism in the case of a clear division of powers at different levels of management and with a clear control of compliance with legal rules and strategic goals. It is concluded that the optimal multifunctional structure of the system of mechanisms of transition of Ukraine to sustainable development should combine structures of all these levels and mechanisms that would complement each other. And direct joint efforts to define and execute strategic decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Filippov Volodymyr, 2020. "Formation of a polyfunctional structure of the system of transition mechanisms of Ukraine to sustainable development," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 1(4(51)), pages 24-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/199293
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akmal Durmanov & Viera Bartosova & Svetlana Drobyazko & Oksana Melnyk & Volodymyr Fillipov, 2019. "Mechanism to ensure sustainable development of enterprises in the information space," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1377-1386, December.
    2. Inna Fedulova & Olga Yurievna Voronkova & Pavel Zhuravlev & Elena Gerasimova & Maria Glyzina & Natalia Andreevna Alekhina, 2019. "Labor productivity and its role in the sustainable development of economy: on the example of a region," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1059-1073, December.
    3. Jan Anton van Zanten & Rob van Tulder, 2018. "Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 208-233, December.
    4. Pratima Bansal, 2005. "Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 197-218, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simone Søgaard Jacobsen & Steffen Korsgaard & Franziska Günzel-Jensen, 2020. "Towards a Typology of Sustainability Practices: A Study of the Potentials and Challenges of Sustainable Practices at the Firm Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Jose Ignacio Galan & Jose Angel Zuñiga‐Vicente, 2023. "Discovering the key factors behind multi‐stakeholder partnerships for contributing to the achievement of sustainable development goals: Insights around the electric vehicle in Spain," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 829-845, March.
    3. Ana T. Ejarque & Vanessa Campos, 2020. "Assessing the Economy for the Common Good Measurement Theory Ability to Integrate the SDGs into MSMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Ambra Galeazzo & Toloue Miandar & Michela Carraro, 2024. "SDGs in corporate responsibility reporting: a longitudinal investigation of institutional determinants and financial performance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(1), pages 113-136, March.
    5. Carmelo Reverte, 2022. "The importance of institutional differences among countries in SDGs achievement: A cross‐country empirical study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1882-1899, December.
    6. Simona Fiandrino & Francesco Scarpa & Riccardo Torelli, 2022. "Fostering Social Impact Through Corporate Implementation of the SDGs: Transformative Mechanisms Towards Interconnectedness and Inclusiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 959-973, November.
    7. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    8. Bárbara Galleli & Elder Semprebon & Joyce Aparecida Ramos dos Santos & Noah Emanuel Brito Teles & Mateus Santos de Freitas-Martins & Raquel Teodoro da Silva Onevetch, 2021. "Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: How Are Organisations Engaging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    10. Mario Vaupel & David Bendig & Denise Fischer-Kreer & Malte Brettel, 2023. "The Role of Share Repurchases for Firms’ Social and Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 401-428, March.
    11. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    12. Ali Saleh Alshebami, 2021. "Evaluating the relevance of green banking practices on Saudi Banks’ green image: The mediating effect of employees’ green behaviour," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 275-286, December.
    13. Anita Fajczak-Kowalska & Anna Misztal & Magdalena Kowalska, 2021. "Energy, Pollution, and Transport Taxes as Instruments of Sustainable Development of Manufacturing Enterprises in Emerging Economies in the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 724-742.
    14. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    15. Sara Trucco & Maria Chiara Demartini & Valentina Beretta, 2021. "The reporting of sustainable development goals: is the integrated approach the missing link?," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-13, February.
    16. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    18. Maël Sommer & Karine Gauche, 2021. "Certification de groupe ISO 14001 et gestion des problèmes de durabilité en petite entreprise : une analyse lexicale du discours des agriculteurs," Post-Print hal-03791169, HAL.
    19. Andrea Lučić, 2020. "Measuring Sustainable Marketing Orientation—Scale Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    20. Zhiqiang Liu & Ji Li & Hong Zhu & Zhenyao Cai & Luning Wang, 2014. "Chinese firms’ sustainable development—The role of future orientation, environmental commitment, and employee training," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 195-213, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    multifunctional structure; organizational and management mechanism; sustainable development of Ukraine; concept of sustainable development; system-integrated approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:ddldem:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.