IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v615y2023i7954d10.1038_s41586-023-05725-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnosing destabilization risk in global land carbon sinks

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos Fernández-Martínez

    (University of Antwerp
    CREAF, Campus de Bellaterra (UAB)
    University of Barcelona)

  • Josep Peñuelas

    (CREAF, Campus de Bellaterra (UAB)
    CSIC, Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra)

  • Frederic Chevallier

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Philippe Ciais

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Michael Obersteiner

    (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
    University of Oxford)

  • Christian Rödenbeck

    (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry)

  • Jordi Sardans

    (CREAF, Campus de Bellaterra (UAB)
    CSIC, Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra)

  • Sara Vicca

    (University of Antwerp)

  • Hui Yang

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Stephen Sitch

    (University of Exeter)

  • Pierre Friedlingstein

    (University of Exeter)

  • Vivek K. Arora

    (Environment and Climate Change Canada)

  • Daniel S. Goll

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Atul K. Jain

    (University of Illinois)

  • Danica L. Lombardozzi

    (National Center for Atmospheric Research)

  • Patrick C. McGuire

    (University of Reading)

  • Ivan A. Janssens

    (University of Antwerp)

Abstract

Global net land carbon uptake or net biome production (NBP) has increased during recent decades1. Whether its temporal variability and autocorrelation have changed during this period, however, remains elusive, even though an increase in both could indicate an increased potential for a destabilized carbon sink2,3. Here, we investigate the trends and controls of net terrestrial carbon uptake and its temporal variability and autocorrelation from 1981 to 2018 using two atmospheric-inversion models, the amplitude of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2 concentration derived from nine monitoring stations distributed across the Pacific Ocean and dynamic global vegetation models. We find that annual NBP and its interdecadal variability increased globally whereas temporal autocorrelation decreased. We observe a separation of regions characterized by increasingly variable NBP, associated with warm regions and increasingly variable temperatures, lower and weaker positive trends in NBP and regions where NBP became stronger and less variable. Plant species richness presented a concave-down parabolic spatial relationship with NBP and its variability at the global scale whereas nitrogen deposition generally increased NBP. Increasing temperature and its increasing variability appear as the most important drivers of declining and increasingly variable NBP. Our results show increasing variability of NBP regionally that can be mostly attributed to climate change and that may point to destabilization of the coupled carbon–climate system.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos Fernández-Martínez & Josep Peñuelas & Frederic Chevallier & Philippe Ciais & Michael Obersteiner & Christian Rödenbeck & Jordi Sardans & Sara Vicca & Hui Yang & Stephen Sitch & Pierre Friedling, 2023. "Diagnosing destabilization risk in global land carbon sinks," Nature, Nature, vol. 615(7954), pages 848-853, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:615:y:2023:i:7954:d:10.1038_s41586-023-05725-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05725-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05725-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-05725-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huicai Yang & Shuqin Zhao & Zhanfei Qin & Zhiguo Qi & Xinying Jiao & Zhen Li, 2024. "Differentiation of Carbon Sink Enhancement Potential in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Jian Chen & Xiaoxiao Zhang & Kai Wang & Zhenguo Yan & Wei Zhang & Lixin Niu & Yanlong Zhang, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage in Areas Rich in Ancient Remains: A Case Study of the Zhouyuan Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:615:y:2023:i:7954:d:10.1038_s41586-023-05725-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.