IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v601y2022i7892d10.1038_s41586-021-04211-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structure and mechanism of the SGLT family of glucose transporters

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Han

    (Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Qianhui Qu

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University School of Medicine
    Fudan University)

  • Deniz Aydin

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University
    Stanford University)

  • Ouliana Panova

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Michael J. Robertson

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Yan Xu

    (Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Ron O. Dror

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University
    Stanford University)

  • Georgios Skiniotis

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Liang Feng

    (Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford University School of Medicine)

Abstract

Glucose is a primary energy source in living cells. The discovery in 1960s that a sodium gradient powers the active uptake of glucose in the intestine1 heralded the concept of a secondary active transporter that can catalyse the movement of a substrate against an electrochemical gradient by harnessing energy from another coupled substrate. Subsequently, coupled Na+/glucose transport was found to be mediated by sodium–glucose cotransporters2,3 (SGLTs). SGLTs are responsible for active glucose and galactose absorption in the intestine and for glucose reabsorption in the kidney4, and are targeted by multiple drugs to treat diabetes5. Several members within the SGLT family transport key metabolites other than glucose2. Here we report cryo-electron microscopy structures of the prototypic human SGLT1 and a related monocarboxylate transporter SMCT1 from the same family. The structures, together with molecular dynamics simulations and functional studies, define the architecture of SGLTs, uncover the mechanism of substrate binding and selectivity, and shed light on water permeability of SGLT1. These results provide insights into the multifaceted functions of SGLTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Han & Qianhui Qu & Deniz Aydin & Ouliana Panova & Michael J. Robertson & Yan Xu & Ron O. Dror & Georgios Skiniotis & Liang Feng, 2022. "Structure and mechanism of the SGLT family of glucose transporters," Nature, Nature, vol. 601(7892), pages 274-279, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:601:y:2022:i:7892:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04211-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04211-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04211-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-021-04211-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Farha Khan & Matthias Elgeti & Samuel Grandfield & Aviv Paz & Fiona B. Naughton & Frank V. Marcoline & Thorsten Althoff & Natalia Ermolova & Ernest M. Wright & Wayne L. Hubbell & Michael Grabe & Jeff , 2023. "Membrane potential accelerates sugar uptake by stabilizing the outward facing conformation of the Na/glucose symporter vSGLT," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Yafei Yuan & Fang Kong & Hanwen Xu & Angqi Zhu & Nieng Yan & Chuangye Yan, 2022. "Cryo-EM structure of human glucose transporter GLUT4," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:601:y:2022:i:7892:d:10.1038_s41586-021-04211-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.