IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v596y2021i7873d10.1038_s41586-021-03819-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

Author

Listed:
  • John Jumper

    (DeepMind)

  • Richard Evans

    (DeepMind)

  • Alexander Pritzel

    (DeepMind)

  • Tim Green

    (DeepMind)

  • Michael Figurnov

    (DeepMind)

  • Olaf Ronneberger

    (DeepMind)

  • Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool

    (DeepMind)

  • Russ Bates

    (DeepMind)

  • Augustin Žídek

    (DeepMind)

  • Anna Potapenko

    (DeepMind)

  • Alex Bridgland

    (DeepMind)

  • Clemens Meyer

    (DeepMind)

  • Simon A. A. Kohl

    (DeepMind)

  • Andrew J. Ballard

    (DeepMind)

  • Andrew Cowie

    (DeepMind)

  • Bernardino Romera-Paredes

    (DeepMind)

  • Stanislav Nikolov

    (DeepMind)

  • Rishub Jain

    (DeepMind)

  • Jonas Adler

    (DeepMind)

  • Trevor Back

    (DeepMind)

  • Stig Petersen

    (DeepMind)

  • David Reiman

    (DeepMind)

  • Ellen Clancy

    (DeepMind)

  • Michal Zielinski

    (DeepMind)

  • Martin Steinegger

    (Seoul National University
    Seoul National University)

  • Michalina Pacholska

    (DeepMind)

  • Tamas Berghammer

    (DeepMind)

  • Sebastian Bodenstein

    (DeepMind)

  • David Silver

    (DeepMind)

  • Oriol Vinyals

    (DeepMind)

  • Andrew W. Senior

    (DeepMind)

  • Koray Kavukcuoglu

    (DeepMind)

  • Pushmeet Kohli

    (DeepMind)

  • Demis Hassabis

    (DeepMind)

Abstract

Proteins are essential to life, and understanding their structure can facilitate a mechanistic understanding of their function. Through an enormous experimental effort1–4, the structures of around 100,000 unique proteins have been determined5, but this represents a small fraction of the billions of known protein sequences6,7. Structural coverage is bottlenecked by the months to years of painstaking effort required to determine a single protein structure. Accurate computational approaches are needed to address this gap and to enable large-scale structural bioinformatics. Predicting the three-dimensional structure that a protein will adopt based solely on its amino acid sequence—the structure prediction component of the ‘protein folding problem’8—has been an important open research problem for more than 50 years9. Despite recent progress10–14, existing methods fall far short of atomic accuracy, especially when no homologous structure is available. Here we provide the first computational method that can regularly predict protein structures with atomic accuracy even in cases in which no similar structure is known. We validated an entirely redesigned version of our neural network-based model, AlphaFold, in the challenging 14th Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP14)15, demonstrating accuracy competitive with experimental structures in a majority of cases and greatly outperforming other methods. Underpinning the latest version of AlphaFold is a novel machine learning approach that incorporates physical and biological knowledge about protein structure, leveraging multi-sequence alignments, into the design of the deep learning algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • John Jumper & Richard Evans & Alexander Pritzel & Tim Green & Michael Figurnov & Olaf Ronneberger & Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool & Russ Bates & Augustin Žídek & Anna Potapenko & Alex Bridgland & Clemens Me, 2021. "Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold," Nature, Nature, vol. 596(7873), pages 583-589, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:596:y:2021:i:7873:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03819-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03819-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:596:y:2021:i:7873:d:10.1038_s41586-021-03819-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.