IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v584y2020i7820d10.1038_s41586-020-2404-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Solomon Hsiang

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
    National Bureau of Economic Research
    Centre for Economic Policy Research)

  • Daniel Allen

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley)

  • Sébastien Annan-Phan

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
    UC Berkeley)

  • Kendon Bell

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
    Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research)

  • Ian Bolliger

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
    UC Berkeley)

  • Trinetta Chong

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley)

  • Hannah Druckenmiller

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
    UC Berkeley)

  • Luna Yue Huang

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
    UC Berkeley)

  • Andrew Hultgren

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
    UC Berkeley)

  • Emma Krasovich

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley)

  • Peiley Lau

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
    UC Berkeley)

  • Jaecheol Lee

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
    UC Berkeley)

  • Esther Rolf

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
    UC Berkeley)

  • Jeanette Tseng

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley)

  • Tiffany Wu

    (Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley)

Abstract

Governments around the world are responding to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic1, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with unprecedented policies designed to slow the growth rate of infections. Many policies, such as closing schools and restricting populations to their homes, impose large and visible costs on society; however, their benefits cannot be directly observed and are currently understood only through process-based simulations2–4. Here we compile data on 1,700 local, regional and national non-pharmaceutical interventions that were deployed in the ongoing pandemic across localities in China, South Korea, Italy, Iran, France and the United States. We then apply reduced-form econometric methods, commonly used to measure the effect of policies on economic growth5,6, to empirically evaluate the effect that these anti-contagion policies have had on the growth rate of infections. In the absence of policy actions, we estimate that early infections of COVID-19 exhibit exponential growth rates of approximately 38% per day. We find that anti-contagion policies have significantly and substantially slowed this growth. Some policies have different effects on different populations, but we obtain consistent evidence that the policy packages that were deployed to reduce the rate of transmission achieved large, beneficial and measurable health outcomes. We estimate that across these 6 countries, interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to averting approximately 495 million total infections. These findings may help to inform decisions regarding whether or when these policies should be deployed, intensified or lifted, and they can support policy-making in the more than 180 other countries in which COVID-19 has been reported7.

Suggested Citation

  • Solomon Hsiang & Daniel Allen & Sébastien Annan-Phan & Kendon Bell & Ian Bolliger & Trinetta Chong & Hannah Druckenmiller & Luna Yue Huang & Andrew Hultgren & Emma Krasovich & Peiley Lau & Jaecheol Le, 2020. "The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic," Nature, Nature, vol. 584(7820), pages 262-267, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:584:y:2020:i:7820:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2404-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2404-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:584:y:2020:i:7820:d:10.1038_s41586-020-2404-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.