IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v572y2019i7769d10.1038_s41586-019-1451-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human placenta has no microbiome but can contain potential pathogens

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus C. de Goffau

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute
    University of Cambridge)

  • Susanne Lager

    (University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
    University of Cambridge
    Uppsala University)

  • Ulla Sovio

    (University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
    University of Cambridge)

  • Francesca Gaccioli

    (University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
    University of Cambridge)

  • Emma Cook

    (University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre)

  • Sharon J. Peacock

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute
    University of Cambridge
    London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Julian Parkhill

    (Wellcome Sanger Institute
    University of Cambridge)

  • D. Stephen Charnock-Jones

    (University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
    University of Cambridge)

  • Gordon C. S. Smith

    (University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
    University of Cambridge)

Abstract

We sought to determine whether pre-eclampsia, spontaneous preterm birth or the delivery of infants who are small for gestational age were associated with the presence of bacterial DNA in the human placenta. Here we show that there was no evidence for the presence of bacteria in the large majority of placental samples, from both complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies. Almost all signals were related either to the acquisition of bacteria during labour and delivery, or to contamination of laboratory reagents with bacterial DNA. The exception was Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus), for which non-contaminant signals were detected in approximately 5% of samples collected before the onset of labour. We conclude that bacterial infection of the placenta is not a common cause of adverse pregnancy outcome and that the human placenta does not have a microbiome, but it does represent a potential site of perinatal acquisition of S. agalactiae, a major cause of neonatal sepsis.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus C. de Goffau & Susanne Lager & Ulla Sovio & Francesca Gaccioli & Emma Cook & Sharon J. Peacock & Julian Parkhill & D. Stephen Charnock-Jones & Gordon C. S. Smith, 2019. "Human placenta has no microbiome but can contain potential pathogens," Nature, Nature, vol. 572(7769), pages 329-334, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:572:y:2019:i:7769:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1451-5
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1451-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1451-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-1451-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vicki Mercado-Evans & Marlyd E. Mejia & Jacob J. Zulk & Samantha Ottinger & Zainab A. Hameed & Camille Serchejian & Madelynn G. Marunde & Clare M. Robertson & Mallory B. Ballard & Simone H. Ruano & Na, 2024. "Gestational diabetes augments group B Streptococcus infection by disrupting maternal immunity and the vaginal microbiota," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Kerstin Thriene & Karin B. Michels, 2023. "Human Gut Microbiota Plasticity throughout the Life Course," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:572:y:2019:i:7769:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1451-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.