IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v527y2015i7576d10.1038_nature16065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Australia is ‘free to choose’ economic growth and falling environmental pressures

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Hatfield-Dodds

    (CSIRO, Black Mountain Laboratories)

  • Heinz Schandl

    (CSIRO, Black Mountain Laboratories)

  • Philip D. Adams

    (Victoria University)

  • Timothy M. Baynes

    (CSIRO)

  • Thomas S. Brinsmead

    (CSIRO, Energy Centre)

  • Brett A. Bryan

    (CSIRO)

  • Francis H. S. Chiew

    (CSIRO, Black Mountain Laboratories)

  • Paul W. Graham

    (CSIRO, Energy Centre)

  • Mike Grundy

    (CSIRO, Queensland Biosciences Precinct)

  • Tom Harwood

    (CSIRO, Black Mountain Laboratories)

  • Rebecca McCallum

    (CSIRO, Black Mountain Laboratories)

  • Rod McCrea

    (CSIRO, Ecosciences Precinct)

  • Lisa E. McKellar

    (CSIRO, Ecosciences Precinct)

  • David Newth

    (CSIRO, Yarralumla Laboratories)

  • Martin Nolan

    (CSIRO)

  • Ian Prosser

    (CSIRO, Black Mountain Laboratories
    † Present address: Bureau of Meteorology, Childers Street, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia)

  • Alex Wonhas

    (CSIRO)

Abstract

Over two centuries of economic growth have put undeniable pressure on the ecological systems that underpin human well-being. While it is agreed that these pressures are increasing, views divide on how they may be alleviated. Some suggest technological advances will automatically keep us from transgressing key environmental thresholds; others that policy reform can reconcile economic and ecological goals; while a third school argues that only a fundamental shift in societal values can keep human demands within the Earth’s ecological limits. Here we use novel integrated analysis of the energy–water–food nexus, rural land use (including biodiversity), material flows and climate change to explore whether mounting ecological pressures in Australia can be reversed, while the population grows and living standards improve. We show that, in the right circumstances, economic and environmental outcomes can be decoupled. Although economic growth is strong across all scenarios, environmental performance varies widely: pressures are projected to more than double, stabilize or fall markedly by 2050. However, we find no evidence that decoupling will occur automatically. Nor do we find that a shift in societal values is required. Rather, extensions of current policies that mobilize technology and incentivize reduced pressure account for the majority of differences in environmental performance. Our results show that Australia can make great progress towards sustainable prosperity, if it chooses to do so.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Hatfield-Dodds & Heinz Schandl & Philip D. Adams & Timothy M. Baynes & Thomas S. Brinsmead & Brett A. Bryan & Francis H. S. Chiew & Paul W. Graham & Mike Grundy & Tom Harwood & Rebecca McCallum , 2015. "Australia is ‘free to choose’ economic growth and falling environmental pressures," Nature, Nature, vol. 527(7576), pages 49-53, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:527:y:2015:i:7576:d:10.1038_nature16065
    DOI: 10.1038/nature16065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature16065
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature16065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Usman Mehmood & Muhammad Umar Aslam & Muhammad Adil Javed, 2023. "Associating Economic Growth and Ecological Footprints through Human Capital and Biocapacity in South Asia," World, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Zhen Yang & Weijun Gao & Jiawei Li, 2022. "Can Economic Growth and Environmental Protection Achieve a “Win–Win” Situation? Empirical Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Thamo, Tas & Addai, Donkor & Kragt, Marit E. & Kingwell, Ross S. & Pannell, David J. & Robertson, Michael J., 2019. "Climate change reduces the mitigation obtainable from sequestration in an Australian farming system," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), October.
    4. Sangha, Kamaljit K & Evans, Jay & Edwards, Andrew & Russell-Smith, Jeremy & Fisher, Rohan & Yates, Cameron & Costanza, Robert, 2021. "Assessing the value of ecosystem services delivered by prescribed fire management in Australian tropical savannas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Huseynov, Samir & Palma, Marco A., 2018. "Does California’s LCFS Reduce CO2 Emissions?," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274200, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Eric J. Chaisson, 2022. "Energy Budgets of Evolving Nations and Their Growing Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-50, November.
    7. Andrew Leigh, 2021. "Putting the Australian Economy on the Scales," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 54(1), pages 19-35, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:527:y:2015:i:7576:d:10.1038_nature16065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.