IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v469y2011i7328d10.1038_nature09588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A selective role for dopamine in stimulus–reward learning

Author

Listed:
  • Shelly B. Flagel

    (Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan)

  • Jeremy J. Clark

    (University of Washington)

  • Terry E. Robinson

    (University of Michigan)

  • Leah Mayo

    (Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan)

  • Alayna Czuj

    (University of Michigan)

  • Ingo Willuhn

    (University of Washington)

  • Christina A. Akers

    (University of Washington)

  • Sarah M. Clinton

    (Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan)

  • Paul E. M. Phillips

    (University of Washington)

  • Huda Akil

    (Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan)

Abstract

Individuals make choices and prioritize goals using complex processes that assign value to rewards and associated stimuli. During Pavlovian learning, previously neutral stimuli that predict rewards can acquire motivational properties, becoming attractive and desirable incentive stimuli. However, whether a cue acts solely as a predictor of reward, or also serves as an incentive stimulus, differs between individuals. Thus, individuals vary in the degree to which cues bias choice and potentially promote maladaptive behaviour. Here we use rats that differ in the incentive motivational properties they attribute to food cues to probe the role of the neurotransmitter dopamine in stimulus–reward learning. We show that intact dopamine transmission is not required for all forms of learning in which reward cues become effective predictors. Rather, dopamine acts selectively in a form of stimulus–reward learning in which incentive salience is assigned to reward cues. In individuals with a propensity for this form of learning, reward cues come to powerfully motivate and control behaviour. This work provides insight into the neurobiology of a form of stimulus–reward learning that confers increased susceptibility to disorders of impulse control.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelly B. Flagel & Jeremy J. Clark & Terry E. Robinson & Leah Mayo & Alayna Czuj & Ingo Willuhn & Christina A. Akers & Sarah M. Clinton & Paul E. M. Phillips & Huda Akil, 2011. "A selective role for dopamine in stimulus–reward learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 469(7328), pages 53-57, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:469:y:2011:i:7328:d:10.1038_nature09588
    DOI: 10.1038/nature09588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09588
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature09588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Skirzewski & Oren Princz-Lebel & Liliana German-Castelan & Alycia M. Crooks & Gerard Kyungwook Kim & Sophie Henke Tarnow & Amy Reichelt & Sara Memar & Daniel Palmer & Yulong Li & R. Jane Rylett, 2022. "Continuous cholinergic-dopaminergic updating in the nucleus accumbens underlies approaches to reward-predicting cues," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Laurens Winkelmeier & Carla Filosa & Renée Hartig & Max Scheller & Markus Sack & Jonathan R. Reinwald & Robert Becker & David Wolf & Martin Fungisai Gerchen & Alexander Sartorius & Andreas Meyer-Linde, 2022. "Striatal hub of dynamic and stabilized prediction coding in forebrain networks for olfactory reinforcement learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:469:y:2011:i:7328:d:10.1038_nature09588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.