IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v452y2008i7185d10.1038_nature06785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias?

Author

Listed:
  • Guy Kahane

    (Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford)

  • Nicholas Shackel

    (ENCAP, University of Cardiff
    Future of Humanity Institute, Faculty of Philosophy & James Martin 21st Century School, University of Oxford)

Abstract

Arising from: M. Koenigs et al. Nature 446, 908–911 (2007)10.1038/nature05631 ; Koenigs et al. reply Neuroscience has recently turned to the study of utilitarian and non-utilitarian moral judgement. Koenigs et al.1 examine the responses of normal subjects and those with ventromedial–prefrontal–cortex (VMPC) damage to moral scenarios drawn from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies by Greene et al.2,3,4, and claim that patients with VMPC damage have an abnormally “utilitarian” pattern of moral judgement. It is crucial to the claims of Koenigs et al. that the scenarios of Greene et al. pose a conflict between utilitarian consequence and duty: however, many of them do not meet this condition. Because of this methodological problem, it is too early to claim that VMPC patients have a utilitarian bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Guy Kahane & Nicholas Shackel, 2008. "Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias?," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7185), pages 5-5, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:452:y:2008:i:7185:d:10.1038_nature06785
    DOI: 10.1038/nature06785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06785
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature06785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc Orlitzky, 2017. "How Cognitive Neuroscience Informs a Subjectivist-Evolutionary Explanation of Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(4), pages 717-732, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:452:y:2008:i:7185:d:10.1038_nature06785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.