IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v443y2006i7108d10.1038_nature05077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The pathological response to DNA damage does not contribute to p53-mediated tumour suppression

Author

Listed:
  • M. A. Christophorou

    (Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California
    Molecular Pharmacology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California)

  • I. Ringshausen

    (Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California
    Molecular Pharmacology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California)

  • A. J. Finch

    (Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California
    Molecular Pharmacology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California)

  • L. Brown Swigart

    (Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California
    Molecular Pharmacology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California)

  • G. I. Evan

    (Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California
    Molecular Pharmacology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California)

Abstract

The two sides of p53 The protein p53 is an important mediator of the DNA damage response and tumour suppression in vertebrates. In general, these two attributes are thought to be causally linked: p53 suppresses tumours by responding to DNA damage or genome abnormalities in tumour cells and triggering growth arrest or apoptosis. Now using a reversibly switchable endogenous p53 mouse model, Christophorou et al. show that the pathological p53-induced response to irradiation is irrelevant to p53-mediated suppression of tumours induced by that irradiation. Conversely, restoring p53 at later times avoids the pathological effects of irradiation but provides much of the tumour suppression. These data suggest that the DNA damage response and tumour suppression are unlinked activities of p53, each induced by distinct signals. A similar conclusion is drawn from a separate experiment, the absence of the tumour suppressor protein ARF was found to abolish the extra cancer-protective activity of an additional copy of p53 in mice. Again, this suggests that oncogenic signalling is critical for triggering protection by p53, whereas activation of p53 as a result of DNA damage has a lesser impact on the final development of tumours. In News and Views, Anton Berns looks at the implications of these findings for models of p53 activity.

Suggested Citation

  • M. A. Christophorou & I. Ringshausen & A. J. Finch & L. Brown Swigart & G. I. Evan, 2006. "The pathological response to DNA damage does not contribute to p53-mediated tumour suppression," Nature, Nature, vol. 443(7108), pages 214-217, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:443:y:2006:i:7108:d:10.1038_nature05077
    DOI: 10.1038/nature05077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature05077
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature05077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ross J. Hill & Nazareno Bona & Job Smink & Hannah K. Webb & Alastair Crisp & Juan I. Garaycoechea & Gerry P. Crossan, 2024. "p53 regulates diverse tissue-specific outcomes to endogenous DNA damage in mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:443:y:2006:i:7108:d:10.1038_nature05077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.