IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v437y2005i7055d10.1038_nature04000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A genome-wide comparison of recent chimpanzee and human segmental duplications

Author

Listed:
  • Ze Cheng

    (University of Washington School of Medicine)

  • Mario Ventura

    (University of Bari)

  • Xinwei She

    (University of Washington School of Medicine)

  • Philipp Khaitovich

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

  • Tina Graves

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Kazutoyo Osoegawa

    (Bruce Lyon Memorial Research Building)

  • Deanna Church

    (National Institutes of Health)

  • Pieter DeJong

    (Bruce Lyon Memorial Research Building)

  • Richard K. Wilson

    (Washington University School of Medicine)

  • Svante Pääbo

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

  • Mariano Rocchi

    (University of Bari)

  • Evan E. Eichler

    (University of Washington School of Medicine)

Abstract

We present a global comparison of differences in content of segmental duplication between human and chimpanzee, and determine that 33% of human duplications (> 94% sequence identity) are not duplicated in chimpanzee, including some human disease-causing duplications. Combining experimental and computational approaches, we estimate a genomic duplication rate of 4–5 megabases per million years since divergence. These changes have resulted in gene expression differences between the species. In terms of numbers of base pairs affected, we determine that de novo duplication has contributed most significantly to differences between the species, followed by deletion of ancestral duplications. Post-speciation gene conversion accounts for less than 10% of recent segmental duplication. Chimpanzee-specific hyperexpansion (> 100 copies) of particular segments of DNA have resulted in marked quantitative differences and alterations in the genome landscape between chimpanzee and human. Almost all of the most extreme differences relate to changes in chromosome structure, including the emergence of African great ape subterminal heterochromatin. Nevertheless, base per base, large segmental duplication events have had a greater impact (2.7%) in altering the genomic landscape of these two species than single-base-pair substitution (1.2%).

Suggested Citation

  • Ze Cheng & Mario Ventura & Xinwei She & Philipp Khaitovich & Tina Graves & Kazutoyo Osoegawa & Deanna Church & Pieter DeJong & Richard K. Wilson & Svante Pääbo & Mariano Rocchi & Evan E. Eichler, 2005. "A genome-wide comparison of recent chimpanzee and human segmental duplications," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7055), pages 88-93, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:437:y:2005:i:7055:d:10.1038_nature04000
    DOI: 10.1038/nature04000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04000
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature04000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kay Young McChesney, 2015. "Teaching Diversity," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:437:y:2005:i:7055:d:10.1038_nature04000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.