IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v8y2024i2d10.1038_s41562-023-01743-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The unequal landscape of civic opportunity in America

Author

Listed:
  • Milan Vries

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Jae Yeon Kim

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Hahrie Han

    (Johns Hopkins University
    Johns Hopkins University)

Abstract

The hollowing of civil society has threatened effective implementation of scientific solutions to pressing public challenges—which often depend on cultivating pro-social orientations commonly studied under the broad umbrella of social capital. Although robust research has studied the constituent components of social capital from the demand side (that is, the orientations people need for collective life in pluralistic societies, such as trust, cohesion and connectedness), the same precision has not been brought to the supply side. Here we define the concept of civic opportunity—opportunities people have to encounter civic experiences necessary for developing such orientations—and harness data science to map it across America. We demonstrate that civic opportunity is more highly correlated with pro-social outcomes such as mutual aid than other measures, but is unequally distributed, and its sources are underrepresented in the public dialogue. Our findings suggest greater attention to this fundamentally uneven landscape of civic opportunity.

Suggested Citation

  • Milan Vries & Jae Yeon Kim & Hahrie Han, 2024. "The unequal landscape of civic opportunity in America," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 256-263, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01743-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01743-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01743-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-023-01743-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01743-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.