IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v8y2024i1d10.1038_s41562-023-01708-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of a US Supreme Court ruling to restrict abortion rights

Author

Listed:
  • Chelsey S. Clark

    (Princeton University)

  • Elizabeth Levy Paluck

    (Princeton University
    Princeton University)

  • Sean J. Westwood

    (Dartmouth College
    Stanford University)

  • Maya Sen

    (Harvard University)

  • Neil Malhotra

    (Stanford University)

  • Stephen Jessee

    (The University of Texas at Austin)

Abstract

Previous research focused on popular US Supreme Court rulings expanding rights; however, less is known about rulings running against prevailing public opinion and restricting rights. We examine the impact of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization opinion, which overturned Roe v. Wade’s (1973) constitutional protection of abortion rights. A three-wave survey panel (5,489 interviews) conducted before the leak of the drafted Dobbs opinion, after the leak, and after the official opinion release, and cross-sectional data from these three time points (10,107 interviews) show that the ruling directly influenced views about the constitutional legality of abortion and fetal viability. However, personal opinions were not directly influenced and perceived social norms shifted away from the ruling, meaning that individuals perceived greater public support for abortion. We argue that extensive coverage of opposition to overturning Roe v. Wade supported this shift. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization also caused large changes, polarized by party identification, in opinions about the Supreme Court.

Suggested Citation

  • Chelsey S. Clark & Elizabeth Levy Paluck & Sean J. Westwood & Maya Sen & Neil Malhotra & Stephen Jessee, 2024. "Effects of a US Supreme Court ruling to restrict abortion rights," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 63-71, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01708-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01708-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01708-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-023-01708-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41562-023-01708-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.