IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v9y2018i1d10.1038_s41467-017-02806-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probability of phenotypically detectable protein damage by ENU-induced mutations in the Mutagenetix database

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Wang

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Chun Hui Bu

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Sara Hildebrand

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Gaoxiang Jia

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Southern Methodist University)

  • Owen M. Siggs

    (Garvan Institute for Medical Research)

  • Stephen Lyon

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • David Pratt

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Lindsay Scott

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Jamie Russell

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Sara Ludwig

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Anne R. Murray

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Eva Marie Y. Moresco

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

  • Bruce Beutler

    (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center)

Abstract

Computational inference of mutation effects is necessary for genetic studies in which many mutations must be considered as etiologic candidates. Programs such as PolyPhen-2 predict the relative severity of damage caused by missense mutations, but not the actual probability that a mutation will reduce/eliminate protein function. Based on genotype and phenotype data for 116,330 ENU-induced mutations in the Mutagenetix database, we calculate that putative null mutations, and PolyPhen-2-classified “probably damaging”, “possibly damaging”, or “probably benign” mutations have, respectively, 61%, 17%, 9.8%, and 4.5% probabilities of causing phenotypically detectable damage in the homozygous state. We use these probabilities in the estimation of genome saturation and the probability that individual proteins have been adequately tested for function in specific genetic screens. We estimate the proportion of essential autosomal genes in Mus musculus (C57BL/6J) and show that viable mutations in essential genes are more likely to induce phenotype than mutations in non-essential genes.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Wang & Chun Hui Bu & Sara Hildebrand & Gaoxiang Jia & Owen M. Siggs & Stephen Lyon & David Pratt & Lindsay Scott & Jamie Russell & Sara Ludwig & Anne R. Murray & Eva Marie Y. Moresco & Bruce Beutl, 2018. "Probability of phenotypically detectable protein damage by ENU-induced mutations in the Mutagenetix database," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-017-02806-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02806-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02806-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-017-02806-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomokazu Konishi, 2021. "SARS-CoV-2 mutations among minks show reduced lethality and infectivity to humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-8, May.
    2. Ran Song & William McAlpine & Aaron M. Fond & Evan Nair-Gill & Jin Huk Choi & Elisabeth E. L. Nyström & Liisa Arike & Sydney Field & Xiaohong Li & Jeffrey A. SoRelle & James J. Moresco & Eva Marie Y. , 2023. "Trans-Golgi protein TVP23B regulates host-microbe interactions via Paneth cell homeostasis and Goblet cell glycosylation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-017-02806-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.