IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v8y2017i1d10.1038_ncomms14811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The comparative immunology of wild and laboratory mice, Mus musculus domesticus

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Abolins

    (School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol)

  • Elizabeth C. King

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Luke Lazarou

    (School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol)

  • Laura Weldon

    (School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol)

  • Louise Hughes

    (School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol)

  • Paul Drescher

    (School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol)

  • John G. Raynes

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Julius C. R. Hafalla

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Mark E. Viney

    (School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol)

  • Eleanor M. Riley

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

Abstract

The laboratory mouse is the workhorse of immunology, used as a model of mammalian immune function, but how well immune responses of laboratory mice reflect those of free-living animals is unknown. Here we comprehensively characterize serological, cellular and functional immune parameters of wild mice and compare them with laboratory mice, finding that wild mouse cellular immune systems are, comparatively, in a highly activated (primed) state. Associations between immune parameters and infection suggest that high level pathogen exposure drives this activation. Moreover, wild mice have a population of highly activated myeloid cells not present in laboratory mice. By contrast, in vitro cytokine responses to pathogen-associated ligands are generally lower in cells from wild mice, probably reflecting the importance of maintaining immune homeostasis in the face of intense antigenic challenge in the wild. These data provide a comprehensive basis for validating (or not) laboratory mice as a useful and relevant immunological model system.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Abolins & Elizabeth C. King & Luke Lazarou & Laura Weldon & Louise Hughes & Paul Drescher & John G. Raynes & Julius C. R. Hafalla & Mark E. Viney & Eleanor M. Riley, 2017. "The comparative immunology of wild and laboratory mice, Mus musculus domesticus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms14811
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14811
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms14811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rani Lill Anjum & Elena Rocca, 2019. "From Ideal to Real Risk: Philosophy of Causation Meets Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 729-740, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms14811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.