IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-47679-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistent survival in consecutive cases of life-supporting porcine kidney xenotransplantation using 10GE source pigs

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Eisenson

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • Yu Hisadome

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • Michelle Santillan

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • Hayato Iwase

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • WeiLi Chen

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
    Nippon Medical School)

  • Akira Shimizu

    (Nippon Medical School)

  • Alex Schulick

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • Du Gu

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • Armaan Akbar

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • Alice Zhou

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • Kristy Koenig

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • Kasinath Kuravi

    (United Therapeutics Corporation)

  • Farzana Rahman

    (United Therapeutics Corporation)

  • Lori Sorrells

    (United Therapeutics Corporation)

  • Lars Burdorf

    (United Therapeutics Corporation)

  • Kristina DeSmet

    (United Therapeutics Corporation)

  • Daniel Warren

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • Leigh Peterson

    (United Therapeutics Corporation)

  • Marc Lorber

    (United Therapeutics Corporation)

  • David Ayares

    (United Therapeutics Corporation)

  • Andrew Cameron

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

  • Kazuhiko Yamada

    (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine)

Abstract

Xenotransplantation represents a possible solution to the organ shortage crisis and is an imminent clinical reality with long-term xenograft survival in pig-to-nonhuman primate (NHP) heart and kidney large animal models, and short-term success in recent human decedent and clinical studies. However, concerns remain about safe clinical translation of these results, given the inconsistency in published survival as well as key differences between preclinical procurement and immunosuppression and clinical standards-of-care. Notably, no studies of solid organ pig-to-NHP transplantation have achieved xenograft survival longer than one month without CD40/CD154 costimulatory blockade, which is not currently an FDA-approved immunosuppression strategy. We now present consistent survival in consecutive cases of pig-to-NHP kidney xenotransplantation, including long-term survival after >3 hours of xenograft cold preservation time as well as long-term survival using FDA-approved immunosuppression. These data provide critical supporting evidence for the safety and feasibility of clinical kidney xenotransplantation. Moreover, long-term survival without CD40/CD154 costimulatory blockade may provide important insights for immunosuppression regimens to be considered for first-in-human clinical trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Eisenson & Yu Hisadome & Michelle Santillan & Hayato Iwase & WeiLi Chen & Akira Shimizu & Alex Schulick & Du Gu & Armaan Akbar & Alice Zhou & Kristy Koenig & Kasinath Kuravi & Farzana Rahman & , 2024. "Consistent survival in consecutive cases of life-supporting porcine kidney xenotransplantation using 10GE source pigs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-7, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-47679-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47679-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47679-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-47679-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-47679-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.