Author
Listed:
- Daniel Schar
(Université Libre de Bruxelles)
- Cheng Zhao
(Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich)
- Yu Wang
(Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich)
- D. G. Joakim Larsson
(University of Gothenburg
University of Gothenburg)
- Marius Gilbert
(Université Libre de Bruxelles
Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Thomas P. Van Boeckel
(Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich
Center for Diseases Dynamics, Economics, and Policy)
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat to human and animal health. However, in aquatic animals—the fastest growing food animal sector globally—AMR trends are seldom documented, particularly in Asia, which contributes two-thirds of global food fish production. Here, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of 749 point prevalence surveys reporting antibiotic-resistant bacteria from aquatic food animals in Asia, extracted from 343 articles published in 2000–2019. We find concerning levels of resistance to medically important antimicrobials in foodborne pathogens. In aquaculture, the percentage of antimicrobial compounds per survey with resistance exceeding 50% (P50) plateaued at 33% [95% confidence interval (CI) 28 to 37%] between 2000 and 2018. In fisheries, P50 decreased from 52% [95% CI 39 to 65%] to 22% [95% CI 14 to 30%]. We map AMR at 10-kilometer resolution, finding resistance hotspots along Asia’s major river systems and coastal waters of China and India. Regions benefitting most from future surveillance efforts are eastern China and India. Scaling up surveillance to strengthen epidemiological evidence on AMR and inform aquaculture and fisheries interventions is needed to mitigate the impact of AMR globally.
Suggested Citation
Daniel Schar & Cheng Zhao & Yu Wang & D. G. Joakim Larsson & Marius Gilbert & Thomas P. Van Boeckel, 2021.
"Twenty-year trends in antimicrobial resistance from aquaculture and fisheries in Asia,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-25655-8
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25655-8
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-25655-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.