IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-21266-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of the 2019–2020 megafires for the biogeography and conservation of Australian vegetation

Author

Listed:
  • Robert C. Godfree

    (CSIRO National Research Collections Australia)

  • Nunzio Knerr

    (CSIRO National Research Collections Australia)

  • Francisco Encinas-Viso

    (CSIRO National Research Collections Australia)

  • David Albrecht

    (Australian National Botanic Gardens)

  • David Bush

    (CSIRO National Research Collections Australia)

  • D. Christine Cargill

    (Australian National Botanic Gardens)

  • Mark Clements

    (Australian National Botanic Gardens)

  • Cécile Gueidan

    (CSIRO National Research Collections Australia)

  • Lydia K. Guja

    (Australian National Botanic Gardens)

  • Tom Harwood

    (CSIRO Land and Water)

  • Leo Joseph

    (CSIRO National Research Collections Australia)

  • Brendan Lepschi

    (Australian National Botanic Gardens)

  • Katharina Nargar

    (James Cook University)

  • Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn

    (CSIRO National Research Collections Australia)

  • Linda M. Broadhurst

    (CSIRO National Research Collections Australia)

Abstract

Australia’s 2019–2020 ‘Black Summer’ bushfires burnt more than 8 million hectares of vegetation across the south-east of the continent, an event unprecedented in the last 200 years. Here we report the impacts of these fires on vascular plant species and communities. Using a map of the fires generated from remotely sensed hotspot data we show that, across 11 Australian bioregions, 17 major native vegetation groups were severely burnt, and up to 67–83% of globally significant rainforests and eucalypt forests and woodlands. Based on geocoded species occurrence data we estimate that >50% of known populations or ranges of 816 native vascular plant species were burnt during the fires, including more than 100 species with geographic ranges more than 500 km across. Habitat and fire response data show that most affected species are resilient to fire. However, the massive biogeographic, demographic and taxonomic breadth of impacts of the 2019–2020 fires may leave some ecosystems, particularly relictual Gondwanan rainforests, susceptible to regeneration failure and landscape-scale decline.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert C. Godfree & Nunzio Knerr & Francisco Encinas-Viso & David Albrecht & David Bush & D. Christine Cargill & Mark Clements & Cécile Gueidan & Lydia K. Guja & Tom Harwood & Leo Joseph & Brendan Lep, 2021. "Implications of the 2019–2020 megafires for the biogeography and conservation of Australian vegetation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-21266-5
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21266-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-21266-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-21266-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Drielsma, Michael J. & Love, Jamie & Taylor, Subhashni & Thapa, Rajesh & Williams, Kristen J., 2022. "General Landscape Connectivity Model (GLCM): a new way to map whole of landscape biodiversity functional connectivity for operational planning and reporting," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-21266-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.