IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcli/v13y2023i12d10.1038_s41558-023-01883-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Important distinctiveness of SSP3–7.0 for use in impact assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Hideo Shiogama

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies)

  • Shinichiro Fujimori

    (Kyoto University)

  • Tomoko Hasegawa

    (Ritsumeikan University)

  • Michiya Hayashi

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies)

  • Yukiko Hirabayashi

    (Shibaura Institute of Technology)

  • Tomoo Ogura

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies)

  • Toshichika Iizumi

    (National Agriculture and Food Research Organization)

  • Kiyoshi Takahashi

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies)

  • Toshihiko Takemura

    (Kyushu University)

Abstract

Recent criticisms have suggested that future emissions are unlikely to lead to the warmest climate scenario available (SSP5–8.5), which has resulted in the second highest scenario (SSP3–7.0) receiving increased attention. The distinctiveness of SSP3–7.0 has not been well recognized, but it is relevant for the proper interpretation of studies that use this scenario.

Suggested Citation

  • Hideo Shiogama & Shinichiro Fujimori & Tomoko Hasegawa & Michiya Hayashi & Yukiko Hirabayashi & Tomoo Ogura & Toshichika Iizumi & Kiyoshi Takahashi & Toshihiko Takemura, 2023. "Important distinctiveness of SSP3–7.0 for use in impact assessments," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(12), pages 1276-1278, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:13:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1038_s41558-023-01883-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41558-023-01883-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01883-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41558-023-01883-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:13:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1038_s41558-023-01883-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.